Michael Barry's word on cloning

michael barry

Senior Member
Reaction score
12
Gents,

ICX is in phase two trials right now. There may be some info this summer, but almost assuredly at the beginning of October. They shot up 20 men with 900 injects over a large area, and 100 injects on a small area of complete baldness with cultured dermal papilla cells and some other cells extracted from the men's donor areas.


There are three other companies that I know of that are working on hair cloning. One is Aderans, one is the Japanese Phoenixbio, one is the Japanese Shishedo. There are some academic interests dipping their hand in this also. ALl have filed patents with dermal papilla cultivated hair growth arts in their respective countries. So they are not pissing in the damned wind.


ICX plans on having a phase 2 B and probably another one or two "phase 2 trials" before a large phase 3 trial with a great deal of men. They are trying to get their cultivation (think breeding) method's down, and the number of injects per centimeter down and probably trying to work out an automated process with a robot to deliver the many many injections one will need.

If 10 or 15 of these men respond well and grow pretty decent hair, you all have a right to get very excited. The trials are being conducted with the Farjo transplant clinic in England.





There are some naysayers about the procedure. I'd like to address them now. Ken Washenik opened his mouth and got people's hopes way way way up back in 2000 about HM being here by 2005. He did this before any human cells were implanted in human skin. He was basing his optomism on rodent dermal papilla cells growing well on rodent skin. Human beings are more complicated than rodents. They have found that there has to be a mixture of Dermal Papilla cells and some stem cells (derived from the epilitheal cells in this instance) for the correct signalling envrionment to be present for the DP cells to get the chemcial signals that are much like yours are in your fetal development. Its complicated stuff.

As for the "direction" question. Stromal tissue seems to correct bad direction in ensuing growth phases. After a rests and sheds in the catagen and telogen phases, the papilla gets very small and migrates northward in the dermis, when it dives down again, it can re-orient itself. The stromal tissue seems to know how to direct it upright. Even men who got screwed up transplants in the eighties have seen the direction at least, begin to match what the natrual hair would have been in a given area as cycles ensue. This isn't much of a comfort for those guys however as the results are still pluggy for many of them, and they still have a mess.
Aderans has filed for patents for cylinder-shaped bio-degradable tissue scaffolds that will ensure proper direction of growth from the first phase onwards. They have recruited for their phase one trial, but have not started it. They very well might be waiting on ICX's results to see where they are before commencing their trial and adjusting their protocol. Bosley (Aderans subsidiary) has bought the rights for first chance to buy ICX's protocol, so Aderans might be able to actually save time if they adjust their protocol based on ICX's results.



IN my opinion, the 2010 date is probably a year or two too optomistic, but let me be clear................................hair cloning will happen in the future guys. The first safety phase grew hair on five out of seven men, and grew over a hundred hairs on a couple of them in a small area. They were just looking to see if there was going to be inflammation or an immune response. They werent even trying to grow hair.................but they did. Now they are TRYING to grow hair.


Some of you (MAHAIR) are very cynical about anything concerning baldness because some surgeon hacked you up. You dont think anything can ever give you your hair back and that baldness is inevitable. First off, if you catch it in time and use finasteride and topical spironolactone...............you'll keep your hair anyway and never lose it. I have just as much hair (a little more in fact) than I did five or six years ago. Ive seen pics of men who had more hair fifteen years after beginning to use finas and minoxidil. Treatments can work if you haven't LOST the hair yet. The scientist involved in this stuff very much believe its going to end baldness. Its just like a transplant, you are simply making one hair into twenty hairs and implanting the twenty hairs in the head.

If you are already bald, just buzz it for a few years (although Id still wash my head with nizoral or revita so that I dont get fibrosis up there, and might consider a copper peptide spray like tricomin for a few years once a day to keep my scalp in good shape for HM). You dont want to try to grow new hair in shiny bald, hardened scalp. At lleast use an anti-inflammatory shampoo like Nizoral on it. When they release a product, you will hear of it. It will be all over the news. I imagine it will be about four to six years from now.
 

lucy923

Established Member
Reaction score
0
sweet f'ing sh*t Michael, you are the man......every balding dude needs someone like you for reassurance. It seems like every damn minute of the day I worry I will be bald in a year or two and it is starting to really get to me, but I feel I can hold it off until this for 4-6 years. Definitely a burden off the chest. Any idea of a rough figure of cost for this??
 

JustinM71

Established Member
Reaction score
2
Thanks for the encouraging info Michael. If I can regrow &/or maintain hair with my finasteride/minoxidil up until it comes out, I'll be laughing.
 

Mahair

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Michael Barry

MB , Are you saying this is something we should feed into ? PM ME I have only recently been back online.
 

Optimist

Established Member
Reaction score
1
This is a good summary of what any poster should know before commenting on HM. Only thing I would add is that the first generation of commerical hm is not expected to be perfect and that Intercytex plans to make modifications etc. after the first release. So if you want the best HM you will probly have to wait 4-5 years after it is released.
 

elguapo

Experienced Member
Reaction score
0
I agree, I think this is an EXCELLENT post, Michael. It already made my Friday.=) Very intelligible... and the optimistic part of me agrees that this will work, eventually.

I never heard that a couple of the Phase I participants grew many hairs, only that 5/7 grew SOME hair. I'm referring to this sentence:

The first safety phase grew hair on five out of seven men, and grew over a hundred hairs on a couple of them in a small area.

Where did you read this? I'd love to read it for myself.

Sure wish they would show us photos of the 5/7 that regrew hair. Who cares how vellous they might have been, it's still a huge step in the right direction, imho.

Thanks.
 

lucy923

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how it works if a person just has moderate hair loss say some recession at the temples and little diffuse thinning, would it be a less expensive procedure to just fill in the temples and at a little thickness as opposed to someone who has extensive hair loss???
 

Optimist

Established Member
Reaction score
1
elguapo said:
I never heard that a couple of the Phase I participants grew many hairs, only that 5/7 grew SOME hair. I'm referring to this sentence:

You are right, that is an inaccuracy. Intercytex has always said only that they had increased growth from the procedure. It really doesn't matter though as they were testing for safety. The phase II efficacy trial is really what matters in terms of seeing if HM works.
 

Mahair

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Just a thought. Even if HM becomes a reality it will be an ongoing process (Just like transplants), you will still be chasing hair loss. As OPTIMIST has pointed out; after the trials to wait and see (After 5 years- SMART). I beleive the only real solution will be genetic intevention and or acceptance. The later seems impossible because of the society we live in and the emotional effect of losing something. Gene therapy is still in flux.
P.S. There is also the carcinogenic question. Never mind the directional.
 

elguapo

Experienced Member
Reaction score
0
I think the idea in our minds right now is that HM is intended to treat balding areas of the scalp. But why couldn't also inject cells between the hair follicles in areas that are not quite balding yet, but are expected to bald? That would be awesome!
 

michael barry

Senior Member
Reaction score
12
The five out of seven men hair growth result was from ICX's phase one results from way back (3 years ago). Dr. Paul Kemp, the leader of the research, was also one of the trialees. He grew 66 new hairs on some completely bald scalp himself. He is a Norwood 6 or so. He wants this protocol to work for HIMSELF. And in that gentleman, you can feel good about the motives of the head of ICX who is (drum roll please), Dr. Kemp.



Im hoping that benign viruses can be used at some point to help cultured dermal papilla-epilitheal stem cell mixtures penetrate the dermis and project their own DNA signature onto your existing hair. This is how topical gene therapies will have to be delivered, as viruses have the ability to leave their DNA in a host organism. For now however, ICX believes its creating brand new hairs in the dermis.


As far as carcinogenesis is concened, none of the lab animals ICX has tested ever got it, and in the three years since the phase one trial, none of the men developed cancer either. Remember folks, these are YOUR cells.....................taken out of the body, prodded to multiply and make more of THEMSELVES, and then shot back into the body.
If you took some blood out, waited a few days, and shot it back in your arm, I wouldn't expect a bad side effect either............even if you got some blood cells to replicate themselves somehow. Thats because its your own DNA. If you put someone else's blood who had a differing blood type back in your arm, you'd probably have an unpleasant side effect.


Out of all the proposed solutions for further baldness............my vote would go to the AndroScience company for the most elegant solution. They are working on a topical extracted from a natural substance (a cicumoid if I remember right) that ends androgen receptor expression in targeted tissues. That would keep you from losing more head hair.

However, for those of us who'd like to grow a little back (like my temples), something more than a simple anti-androgen will be necessary. Out of hedgehog pathways, beta catenin pathways, Osteoscreen, and Hair multiplication.....................its my opinion that HM would offer the most potentially safe and aesthetically manipulative result possible. If this stuff really works good, then someday in the future (maybe 20 years), a man would be able to literally design his preferential hariline replete with or without a widow's peak, thickened sides, etc.

On genetic therapies.........................They are the "ultimate solution". However, there are 4 known genes involved in baldness, and there are probabaly 2-or 3 more out there. Getting a topical that will nullify them, and not be systemically absorbed, and not have bad side effects, and getting them to the target tissue, and how long their effects will last, and how much will they cost to develop are tough questions and problems to overcome. I think it will happen someday, but HM is a much more feasible and doable project for science in the near term. You are just taking out DP cells and some extra cells needed for proper signalling, multiplying them in a petri dish, and shooting them back in the scalp.


Cohen Gho has had some success with just cutting dermal papillas in half an getting some of them to regenerate both halves, one back in the donor area and one in the recipeint area. Problem is, he can only do 600 or so a day, and he has to wait at least nine months to re-harvest the same area, and he only gets about 80% donor area regeneration and about a similar percentage of hairs in the recipeint area to grow. Its costly, takes several years, doesn't replicate entire follicular units, but just single hairs, and takes many many surgeries. But he's done it successfully, thus proven one hair can indeed be made into two. HM is far more advanced than that.


Like I said.....................Im expecting a product to be availed to the public either here or somewhere in Europe/Russia by 2012 or so. A better one five or six years after that. This IS science.



Until then, a good buzz and treatments are the best option out there.



Here is ICX's faq's page from their website:
ICX-TRC - Frequently Asked Questions
Intercytex is asked many questions about ICX-TRC, so in response, this new web-page has been created to provide some answers.

Please note: ICX-TRC is at an early stage of its development and there are still many unknowns which will become clearer as the clinical programme develops and the regulatory environment matures. The answers given below are provided by Intercytex in good faith based on current knowledge, but they are subject to change due to clinical trial results, scientific research or other factors which influence the development of new healthcare products. Therefore, anyone reading the information below is asked to do so in the same spirit and should not alter any current or future medication or hair treatment plan as a result.

Our web-site is frequently updated so please see the relevant pages for the latest information on ICX-TRC.

When this page is amended, an alert will be sent to everyone who has registered via the alert service, which can be found on the upper navigation bar on the Home page of this website.

1. How can I receive ICX-TRC?
ICX-TRC is currently in Phase II clinical trials in the UK, so it is not yet widely available.

2. When will ICX-TRC be on the market?
ICX-TRC is classified as a medicine by the regulatory authorities and hence has to undergo a series of clinical trials before it can be offered on the market. We currently estimate that the earliest that ICX-TRC would be available on the market is 2010 although we don't know in which country it will be launched first.

3. How can I stay in touch with ICX-TRC’s progress?
Please watch our website for news and announcements about ICX-TRC and sign up via the news alert so you can stay up-to-date with our progress.

4. When will the Phase II trial be completed?
It is a rolling trial which will optimise the formulation and delivery as well as studying safety and efficacy. We expect some data will become available during 2007. We anticipate the current trial will complete during 2008.

5. Will there be a Phase II or III trial in the US?
At the moment the Phase II trial will be conducted in the UK only. Phase III trials may be conducted in both the US and the UK but plans to do so have not been finalised.

6. May I take part in the Phase II clinical trial?
The trials are being conducted at the Farjo Medical Centre in Manchester so all volunteers need to come from that area of the UK, partly for safety reasons but mainly because of their evaluation at the clinic for 48 weeks after the procedure has been undertaken. If you live in the Manchester area and would like to be considered for participation in the trial, please contact clinicaltrials@intercytex.com.

7. How much will ICX-TRC cost?
It is too early to be able to determine the likely price.

8. Will ICX-TRC be available on the NHS or covered by insurance?
We don’t know if ICX-TRC will be available on the NHS, however most procedures regarded as “cosmetic†are not covered by NHS or medical insurance.

9. Do you have before and after photos?
There are no before or after pictures yet. This is because the first clinical trial, the Phase I trial, was to test for safety not efficacy. Although hair growth was observed, it was not the primary purpose of the trial.

10. Will it be possible to grow a full head of hair using ICX-TRC?
Theoretically yes. If a person has enough hair at the back of the head from which to take a small sample of cells, we believe that ultimately it may be possible for their entire head to be re-populated with hair using the procedure.

11. If I have had a transplant will it prevent me from using ICX-TRC at a later date?
No, not at all. It may well be that ICX-TRC will work very well with a transplant and could be used to “top-up†a transplant if there is insufficient hair for a whole transplant to be carried out.

12. Would I need several treatments with ICX-TRC?
ICX-TRC will not stop the natural process of hair loss so what you might need is a series of “top-up†treatments over time so that a full head of hair could always be maintained as you continued to lose your own hair. We anticipate that only one small biopsy would be required at the start though as the cells would be cryopreserved and thawed as needed.

13. Would new hair grow in the same direction as the old?
In the ICX-TRC procedure we are not transplanting hair follicles, instead we are implanting cells into the skin which induce new hair growth, so there is no reason for these hairs to grow in a different direction from before.

14. Could ICX-TRC be used to treat the hair loss found in alopecia areata and totalis?
We do not know if ICX-TRC could be used to treat these conditions. These conditions are thought to be caused by an autoimmune mechanism. Since ICX-TRC is autologous (meaning it uses the patient’s own cells) it may be that the underlying autoimmunity might attack and destroy ICX-TRC cells just as it attacked and destroyed intact hair follicle cells to cause the initial hair loss.

15. Would new hair be resistant to the hormones that cause hair loss in the first place?
Male pattern baldness, the most common type of hair loss, is caused by hormones which generally affect the central and frontal areas of hair but not the entire head. Hair at the back and sides remains and it is cells from this part of the head – cells which are resistant to the hormones, that are used in the ICX-TRC process.

16. Could ICX-TRC be used to treat female diffuse alopecia?
We hope so. If ICX-TRC is successful in Phase II trials for male pattern baldness, we plan to begin trials for female diffuse alopecia.

17. Would it be possible to use donor hair for the ICX-TRC procedure if for example, someone had lost all their hair, wanted different coloured hair or a different textured hair?
In short the answers are maybe, no and no. The use of allogeneic or donor cells is a long-term goal but it is many years away. The colour of the hair comes from the epidermis and not the dermal papilla cells so the cells that are cultured have no influence on hair colour. Different textured hair would also require allogeneic cells which is currently not possible.

18. How will ICX-TRC be administered?
ICX-TRC will be administered by a healthcare specialist; a dermatologist, plastic surgeon or similarly qualified individual who will need to take a biopsy (a small sample of cells from the back of the patient’s head) during the first part of the treatment and to inject cells into the patient’s scalp during the second part of the procedure.

19. Does the ICX-TRC procedure result in the regeneration of miniaturised follicles or the growth of new follicles (neogenesis)?
Studies indicate that both of these mechanisms may be active. “Intrafollicular†implantation would take advantage of the follicle structure retained by the miniaturised follicles – these follicles would already be aligned in the appropriate direction so rejuvenating or reactivating such pre-existing hairs may be easier than forming new ones in the case of "interfollicular†implantation. Intercytex is looking at both neogenesis and regeneration.


Please click on the link below to access the following publication:
Follicular Cell Implantation: An Emerging Cell Therapy for Hair Loss by Jeff' Teumer PhD and Jerry Cooley MD, Seminars in Plastic Surgery/Volume 19, Number 2, 2005
http://www.thieme-connect.com
 

michael barry

Senior Member
Reaction score
12
One more smarmy remark before I leave. Here is a pic of a guy who has done finasteride and some dutasteride along with minoxidil over a fifteen year period, http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h81/m ... MOhair.jpg.

As you can tell, he has more hair now than he had then. Ive had similar success in just treating it, although my recessed temples havent came back. I probably have a little more hair than this guy above. Id be pretty much bald by now without treatements in my opinon.

If you want to keep what you have, ....................Id suggest finasteride, topical spironolactone twice a day, and nizoral shampoo 2-3 times a week.

If you'd like to grow a little back, rotate the nizoral with a piricotone olamine shampoo (some of the T-gels have this from Neutragena, its an anti-oxidant that has given some regrowth), use minoxidil and perhaps add retin-A. I have a high opinion of prox-n and think tricomin is also a product of some efficacy.


Just the finas and topical spironolactone to the entire male pattern baldness area should see you keep what you have however.


In a way, baldness is already "cured" if you still have your hair. If I was 19 right now and knew about finas and sprio..................Id' never have lost any in the first place.
 

FabioM

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Michael thanks for this thread man.

I still keep myself optimistic that i wont go bald and will have my hairline back again but even if that doesn´t happen i will buzz my out...there´s plenty of bald guys where i work and most of them look good with it and don´t seem to let baldness affect them.

Life´s a gift people, with hair or without hair...cheer up and smell the cofe :)
 

FabioM

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Btw it is possible even with a thining head to have an HM procedure no?

Or i just have to let my head go bald? :D
 

Optimist

Established Member
Reaction score
1
FabioM said:
Btw it is possible even with a thining head to have an HM procedure no?

If your head shrinks to the point where it no longer exists than you will not be eligible for HM. However, if your head exists, you should be able to get it as long as you have 120 grafts left on it.
 

Thinning Sucks

Experienced Member
Reaction score
42
I know it's premature...... but any ~ idea on how much it will cost....typical of todays hair transplants? 10X the cost?
 

FabioM

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Optimist said:
FabioM said:
Btw it is possible even with a thining head to have an HM procedure no?

If your head shrinks to the point where it no longer exists than you will not be eligible for HM. However, if your head exists, you should be able to get it as long as you have 120 grafts left on it.

Are you saying that being a NW7 wont allow for HM ?

You got me confused there :?

I guess you were saying that being a NW7 but having hair on the sides allows for HM.
 

Optimist

Established Member
Reaction score
1
FabioM said:
Optimist said:
FabioM said:
Btw it is possible even with a thining head to have an HM procedure no?

If your head shrinks to the point where it no longer exists than you will not be eligible for HM. However, if your head exists, you should be able to get it as long as you have 120 grafts left on it.

Are you saying that being a NW7 wont allow for HM ?

You got me confused there :?

I guess you were saying that being a NW7 but having hair on the sides allows for HM.


Sorry, I was just being a jackass and joking about you saying that your head was thinning rather than your hair thinning. But what I said is basically true, as long as you have a few grafts left on you head you should be able to get HM regardless of previous surgeries or thinning hear etc. The idea is that they take a few grafts and make many out of them, kind of like the feeding of the five thousand with the 2 loafs of bread; yes, Jesus cloned them.
 

FabioM

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Ah alright,nice one :lol:

Sometimes we give the same meaning to both hair and head in here that i thought you were really speaking about hair :D
 

Mahair

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Hey , Fabio . Thats a good look you have going. Better than vin diesel. Also I am worried about the carcenogenic effect of multiplying cells.
 
Top