Long hair vs. Short Hair (Hair Roots)

[Chemical J]

Okay so I was reading on some site on google that the longer your hair is the more greasy it gets, the more oily it gets, destroys/damages roots if you are suffering male pattern baldness.


They say to keep the hair short at all times if you want to keep your existing hair even on meds or not. More oils break down the roots of your hair which can potentially damage that follicle.


Truth to this?

 

[Guest]

total bs propagated by idiotic naturalists and a lot of hairdressers and other people with no knowledge of male pattern baldness

 

[Chemical J]

Thank you.

The site was basing it off a hairdressers opinion.


*EDIT Grats on 6666 post jayman lol :freaked:

 

[Stu85]

*EDIT Grats on 6666 post jayman lol :freaked:

:shock: And I thought I spent too much time on this forum! :lol:

 

[plusryan]

jay is duh male pattern baldness junkie! weeeeeeeeewooooo

 

[Armando Jose]

I think that hair's surface is important to remove the continously sebum created in sebaceous gland.

If you have a extremely hair short is worse.

Possibly women hair is the same that men's hair, and crearly women suffer less from common baldness.

Armando

 

[Nathaniel]

If you want to keep your hair don't believe what hairdressers or naturalists have to say about male pattern baldness.

 

[hair today gone tomorrow]

I think that hair's surface is important to remove the continously sebum created in sebaceous gland.

If you have a extremely hair short is worse.

Possibly women hair is the same that men's hair, and crearly women suffer less from common baldness.

Armando

dude, are you serious?

 

[plusryan]

it's f*****g logic amando, apparently you don't use your own.


uhhhh if the hair is cut short, the roots aren't getting tugged on so-to-speak.

hence having longer hair weighs more thus in effect tugging; creating more sebum.


bingo was his name-o

 

[hair today gone tomorrow]

it's f****ing logic amando, apparently you don't use your own.


uhhhh if the hair is cut short, the roots aren't getting tugged on so-to-speak.

hence having longer hair weighs more thus in effect tugging; creating more sebum.


bingo was his name-o

Wrong again.

 

[powersam]

ok so we all know about people who get their hair done in cornrows often losing hair due to the constant pulling effect on the hair. its called traction alopecia.

however this takes quite a lot of pressure, and your hair would probably have to be meters long before it was heavy enough to affect the follicle in that way.

that said, when your hair is long you often tie it back in a pony tail, and having them tied too tight can put too much pressure on the hair and make it fall out.

so having long hair could be bad for your hair, but only if you tied it back in a tight ponytail all the time.

 

[plusryan]

what the hell do you mean I'm wrong again? .......


I WAS COMPARING HIS ARGUEMENT, in other words, if you were to have long or short hair, by god i bet you a very small percentage having short hair wins.

But again I know it doesn't matter either way. because the percentage is so small it doesn't even count.


SAY I'M WRONG AGAIN, DO IT

 

[powersam]

WRONG AGAIN !!!%#^#$^@#

 

[Armando Jose]

Yes, this is my theory, a simple theory that explain most of the things observed in common baldness.

http://www.againstalopeciaandbaldness.com

Armando

 

[Nathaniel]

owned.