Kitchen-Sink versus Gradual build up

WillNotLetItHappen

Established Member
Reaction score
20
Ok, I got an interesting one I think. For all the hair loss-fighters (I know it will be alot of speculation here):

Being as impatient as I am and having read a lot about the regimes of other people on here, I cannot resist the urge of adding more products to the regimen in the hope it improves results or increases the speed of results.

Isn't it better to throw in all you got now (kitchen-sink approach) and get good regrowth say. And then you have a very healthy starting point for what is inevitable (for now): that you continue to lose hair in the future.

Alternative: start with say finasteride and take that for 2 years. Add Rogaine. Add Derma Roller. Add RU or whatever. Gradual build up of the regime over say a couple of years.

Isn't it that you could lose some follicles on the way of a gradual build up that with the kitchen sink approach could have been revived before?
 

WillNotLetItHappen

Established Member
Reaction score
20
I know and this argument is often used, but do you really care? Say you get your full head of hair back (ideal). Then you can slowly remove stuff and see if you maintain. This is then the reverse order and you maybe have spent more money than needed to get there. In any case you got there with a full arsenal and got a good starting point to start losing hair again in the future if you see what I mean...
 

WillNotLetItHappen

Established Member
Reaction score
20
I see...maybe the approach should be use the least to get the max results after all?!
 
Top