James Bond's new look

Johnny24601

Experienced Member
Reaction score
2
re:

I wonder, why people think he looks ugly.
Seriously, it's so pathetic (IMO) that your first reaction (in print at least) to the fact that the guy has decided to trim his hair short despite the fact that he has lost some hair is....he looks ugly. So the guy is not allowed to buzz down his hair without people like you going onto message boards and calling him ugly? I think that says more about you then it does about Mr. Craig. It's people like you that cause men to lose their mind over hairloss.
 

haunted-ballroom

Experienced Member
Reaction score
5
Re: re:

Johnny24601 said:
I wonder, why people think he looks ugly.
Seriously, it's so pathetic (IMO) that your first reaction (in print at least) to the fact that the guy has decided to trim his hair short despite the fact that he has lost some hair is....he looks ugly. So the guy is not allowed to buzz down his hair without people like you going onto message boards and calling him ugly? I think that says more about you then it does about Mr. Craig. It's people like you that cause men to lose their mind over hairloss.

Agreed
 
G

Guest

Guest
Maybe "ugly" is the wrong term. Of course, he doesn´t look ugly in the literal sense. It is just that he looks much older and not as good as he used to with longer hair. Why he did that is beyond me....
 

Aplunk1

Senior Member
Reaction score
9
I NEVER liked the new Bond.

He doesn't encompass all the excellent qualities that makes for a TRUE Bond:

Nice Cars... f***, in the Casino Royale, he drove some Ford piece of sh*t.

Looks good in Tuxedo.... He looks like a shmuck trying to impress mommy.

Drinker.... He drank, yeah, but not like a good ol' alcoholic true Bond. Wasn't impressive.

Sexiness... Sure, he's a tall guy, but his ruggedness takes away from the traditional sexy nature of Bond. He sucks.

Gadgets... The gadgets in that movie sucked. Where are the 1950's technobrain gadgets that are SUPPOSED to be in the Bond movies?
 

Itsonlyinmyhead

Established Member
Reaction score
0
what are you on about, he looks damn good, and Im male and straight. I think he realised that it wasnt cool to comb over his receeding sides.


Casino Royale was different because its the first bond film so he isnt allowed all the gadgets and cars because he isnt that highly rated.

Remember its the first Bond installment in the books and now meant to be the first in the films in terms or character development. Kind of like Batman begins
 

Apoc

Established Member
Reaction score
0
I like the guy. He seems more authentic. This is how a secret agent should look like. Not some showoff Pierce Brosnan style who cares about nothing but girls, booze and cars. Pierce looked like a playboy but Craig looks mean and dangerous. I know I'd be helluva more scared if Craig said he was going to kick my *** than Pierce.
 

evildude

Established Member
Reaction score
2
i think daniel craig is the best bond ever. he's exactly what bond should be;hard as nails, cold, efficient, while at the same time witty and with a sense of humor.

bond was never intended to be some slick ladies man who looked like he cared more about his hair than doing his job.

btw, my gf thinks he's hot as hell.
 

evildude

Established Member
Reaction score
2
it's close. connery had much of that same tough as nails, cold as stone killer thing going. not as polished as the later bonds.
 

blondeguy

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Taugenichts said:
Maybe "ugly" is the wrong term. Of course, he doesn´t look ugly in the literal sense. It is just that he looks much older and not as good as he used to with longer hair. Why he did that is beyond me....

That is totally in your mind, Taug. He looks just as good to me...that's because I don't obsess over hair.
 

JayB

Experienced Member
Reaction score
8
can you people friggin read? He did it for a role...WTF is wrong with you people..do you do that in every aspect of your life? just look at something without giving it the time of day to find out what information is actually contained in what you are looking at?

He looks cool with the head shaved. If i was him assuming his hairloss is stabilized, id look into lowering the hairline. He'd look better
 

holly

Member
Reaction score
0
Dudes, from a girl's point of view, he's totally hot. Norwood 2 or 3 or 4, doesn't matter. He's hot. Really, from a women's point of view, hair is not the be all and end all.
 

BornBaldDieBald

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Pierce Brosnan wasn't a bad james bond. But it is nice to see the more rugged man coming into the picture. Craig looks fine with his hair, I'll be glad to have half as much hair at his age.
 

s.a.f

Senior Member
Reaction score
67
My views: He's Nw2.5, He's a good Bond he has his own take on the role and is'nt just trying to copy the previous Bonds, and yes he looked much better with longer hair.
 

Sean68

Senior Member
Reaction score
5
i think he pulls it off really well but at the end of the day james bond
is naff and always has been. the guy wears pringle sweaters(with a roll neck underneath for good measure) and orders martinis with olives in for gods sake! i cant watch a james bond film these days without thinking
about alan partridge.
 
Top