- Reaction score
- 54
When I first stumbled upon this and other forums on hair loss I was extremely excited that there is so much research going on in this field. However, it was also extremely frustrating and time consuming in the beginning to read up on new treatments which are under investigation with their unintuitive names (e.g. sm04554, CB-03-01, RU-58841, Histogen's HSC, and so on). This is why I'm particularly thankful for the "hair loss clinical research pipeline" and the way the information on each topic is comprehensively presented under this link: https://www.hairlosstalk.com/pipeline/ --> Those who haven't read the content that is summarized under this link are highly advised to do so!
I am also aware of the blogs "hairlosscure2020" and "folliclethough", but they sometimes seem biased and I actually do appreciate being able to read up about new developments on this website before the owners of these aforementioned blogs decide to write a new post.
Props really go out to users like noisette, swoop or hellouser (sorry if I forgot some names here). However, there are some really fu**ed up morons on here who are basically just grieving for attention, who have no fu**ing idea what they are saying or what they actually want to say. These user massively pull down the quality of this forum and make it extremely annoying to read a thread and also make it hard to actually figured out what is actually new and interesting at the moment about a specific topic. For instance, just look at the Brotzu thread, there is absolutely no reason why this thing should have 155 pages (and counting).
There is a tone of information on here - some useful, but most not - and over time I forget stuff I read on here. But some things should be kept in mind when a specific topic is talked about. Again, for instance look at the Brotzu thread where people keep on forgetting and asking about the interview he gave a couple of weeks ago. Hence, I think it would be extremely helpful for all of us if there was some kind of thread that had a list of the most important posts and links on each thread. Maybe it could look something like this:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brotzu lotion:
Interview with Brotzu [Link] [Date]
(rumor, not confirmed) Claim by user about going from Norwood 5 to Norwood 3 - and still improving [Link] [Date]
Link to Brotzu's AA study published in Italian medical journal [Link] [Date]
...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hintogen:
Last statement by Claire Higgins on possible release date in Mexico [Link]
Pictures of Histogen's case studies raise questions [Link]
...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follica:
New document about follica indicates 2018 release [Link] [Date]
RAIN regiment: New pictures on website indicate a possible distinct regiment [Link] [Date]
...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...and so on:
etc.
Maybe you guys have a better idea how to structure this. Would be really great if the quality posters on this forum could make this work in some way. Thanks!
I am also aware of the blogs "hairlosscure2020" and "folliclethough", but they sometimes seem biased and I actually do appreciate being able to read up about new developments on this website before the owners of these aforementioned blogs decide to write a new post.
Props really go out to users like noisette, swoop or hellouser (sorry if I forgot some names here). However, there are some really fu**ed up morons on here who are basically just grieving for attention, who have no fu**ing idea what they are saying or what they actually want to say. These user massively pull down the quality of this forum and make it extremely annoying to read a thread and also make it hard to actually figured out what is actually new and interesting at the moment about a specific topic. For instance, just look at the Brotzu thread, there is absolutely no reason why this thing should have 155 pages (and counting).
There is a tone of information on here - some useful, but most not - and over time I forget stuff I read on here. But some things should be kept in mind when a specific topic is talked about. Again, for instance look at the Brotzu thread where people keep on forgetting and asking about the interview he gave a couple of weeks ago. Hence, I think it would be extremely helpful for all of us if there was some kind of thread that had a list of the most important posts and links on each thread. Maybe it could look something like this:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brotzu lotion:
Interview with Brotzu [Link] [Date]
(rumor, not confirmed) Claim by user about going from Norwood 5 to Norwood 3 - and still improving [Link] [Date]
Link to Brotzu's AA study published in Italian medical journal [Link] [Date]
...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hintogen:
Last statement by Claire Higgins on possible release date in Mexico [Link]
Pictures of Histogen's case studies raise questions [Link]
...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follica:
New document about follica indicates 2018 release [Link] [Date]
RAIN regiment: New pictures on website indicate a possible distinct regiment [Link] [Date]
...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...and so on:
etc.
Maybe you guys have a better idea how to structure this. Would be really great if the quality posters on this forum could make this work in some way. Thanks!
