Correlation between old age and no hair loss?
In my opinion, if there is any such correlation, it is only a weak one. male pattern baldness is primarily caused by a genetic sensitivity of the hair follicles to DHT and other androgens, and I don't see how this androgenic sensitivity would be strongly associated with any particular serious medical condition that would reduce a person's life expectancy.
There is, however, some evidence that male pattern baldness increases your risk of prostate cancer and certain other health problems. male pattern baldness that includes crown loss has a definite link to a higher risk of coronary heart disease, and this could be due to insulin resistance (a precursor to diabetes), a state of chronic inflammation, or increased sensitivity to testosterone. These things are all involved directly or indirectly in promoting cardiovascular disease.
why the fuk cant scientists and doctors figure out hair loss, so many people suffer from it u think there would be a drive to make permanent cure or solution and rewarded with profits
I believe that if male pattern baldness was primarily a disease affecting women, there would be a total cure found by now. No way would we still be at the finasteride/dutasteride stage. Because male pattern baldness is primarily a male disease, there is less cosmetic and pharmaceutical interest in putting time and money into working towards a cure.
Also, remember that a large proportion of male pattern baldness sufferers are already married and settled in life by the time their hair loss starts, and they probably don't feel much need to treat it. It is only a small minority who begin balding in their teens or in their very early 20s.
Hopefully, however, there will be a cure soon. CB-03-01 seems to be the most promising of all the potential treatments on the horizon, especially now that an effective vehicle seems to have been found for it. I really, really hope that CB will turn out to be as amazing as people anticipate. We will have to wait and see.
