rapidfrontal
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 0
This is how I understand the male pattern baldness process:
When a person is going bald, the follicles are in the process of minituarizing on their way to scarring. Doesn't this mean that when a person is shedding, the robust, pigmented hairs that fall out are definitely going to be replaced? If a shed consisted of all thin, colorless hairs, they probably would never be replaced by new hairs because those follicles are clearly in the process of minituarizing and dying out forever. However, if a shed consisted of thick, pigmented, healthy looking hairs, can't it be safely assumed that those folliceles are still producing healthy hairs and therefore will soon produce new growth.
In other words, a person going bald is in a process of minituarization, while a person shedding healthy thick hair will DEFINITELY be regrowing hairs from those follicles even if they are not as healthy as the ones that were shed, so shedding of healthy looking hairs is a sign that they will be back soon. Does anybody agree or disagree with this statement?
When a person is going bald, the follicles are in the process of minituarizing on their way to scarring. Doesn't this mean that when a person is shedding, the robust, pigmented hairs that fall out are definitely going to be replaced? If a shed consisted of all thin, colorless hairs, they probably would never be replaced by new hairs because those follicles are clearly in the process of minituarizing and dying out forever. However, if a shed consisted of thick, pigmented, healthy looking hairs, can't it be safely assumed that those folliceles are still producing healthy hairs and therefore will soon produce new growth.
In other words, a person going bald is in a process of minituarization, while a person shedding healthy thick hair will DEFINITELY be regrowing hairs from those follicles even if they are not as healthy as the ones that were shed, so shedding of healthy looking hairs is a sign that they will be back soon. Does anybody agree or disagree with this statement?
