If my insurance wont pay for hair meds i'll sue.

[powersam]

thankyou global. i do most definately appreciate the support, not too many here seem to want me to even try, let alone succeed.

 

[bubka]

you dont really answer the point bubka. why is hair loss for women considered a medical condition covered under insurance but not hair loss in men? because more men have hair loss? that answer is totally inadequate.
for both sexes hair loss is a cosmetic condition, as far as we know at the moment. but more and more information is pointing to it being symptomatic of other underlying conditions.

wft medications and or treatments that are coverer by insurance that are for ONLY female hairloss that you speak of ???

and "symptomatic of other underlying conditions" do you want to let us in on this theory of yours?

the majority of women get age spots and wrinkles, should they sue to have insurance pay to remove those too?

 

[powersam]

all your points have already been answered in this thread.

 

[bubka]

wow, could you point them out or even answer them please?

the female meds, treatments? that insurance pays for???