I just watched The Shield and...

[MrBastard]

...look at this friggin hairline!

[attachment=0:2gz0f9z4]noname.png[/attachment:2gz0f9z4]

How is that even possible? He might be 50+, and dident even go to he straight one :shock:

 

[mpbsux20]

I see weirdos like that every once in a while.At least he has the option of removing it if he doesn't need it. :whistle:

 

[MrBastard]

Another one a little in the serie
[attachment=0:2igip95g]noname2.png[/attachment:2igip95g]

Its is a little extreme. I figure a short pikey look whould be hard without looking weird with that much hair... Its eather long styled or buzzed, right?

 

[cuebald]

I have a friend who has hair exactly like that, his temples almost touch his eyebrows. This geezer will never have to worry about male pattern baldness either; I went to a family barbecue at his and his father and grandfather had hairlines that were basically the same. NW0.5 (the grandfather had diffused a little (all over his head, not just on top) but at 80+ even women diffuse.)

I think in this families' case the hair must not have any DHT receptors at all (or they don't function). The hair doesn't even mature post-puberty.

Who needs that much hair anyway? I'd prefer a NW1.5 - NW2. My aforementioned friend has a very hairy face too so it looks like he's only half evolved. But, it's better than being a NW4 :mrgreen:

I wonder if the NW7 in the first pic is jealous

 

[TheGrayMan2001]

NW1 to NW2 maintaining full density is the ideal look. Some people pull off NW3 very well if they never lose density.

NW0 hairlines always look REALLY weird. I've noticed they are most common among some Native Americans and some southern Italians