Quantum Cat
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 137
and not the back and sides.
I've heard of the Galea theory - but are there any proven theories?
I've heard of the Galea theory - but are there any proven theories?
Too true! To think that my hair was so thick that I needed the undercut, lol! Even with my minimal loss, I couldn't pull that style off now!true, i used to have the fade too, ****in badass cut
however, in this alternate reality it still has all the same principles of hair loss i.e. happens more often as you get older therefore it wud still have the same connotations i guess
altho this time it wud be the same as an established haircut haha
ive said before its weird how the inverse of hair loss is a haircut (the fade)
why?Too true! To think that my hair was so thick that I needed the undercut, lol! Even with my minimal loss, I couldn't pull that style off now!
ah i see . . . . . .No just that my hair would just seem super thin without the hair underneath it to add some volume. I don't always do the fringe down I have kind of had it like a quiff which shows off my hairline. It only looks thin close up, just wish I could sort my temple points out, but they've always been pretty thin too.
haha yea u never thought of using a fringe/bangs?Something I never gave any thought to. Otherwise I'd have been covering up my big forehead years ago![]()
why?
reveals ur hairline too much eh?
huh . . . . i never heard of that term "undercut" must be only used up dere where the beatles come from hahaahah
haha coolI used to have a centre part when I had my undercut, that was the nearest I came to a fringe. When I was around your age, I'd gone for short and spikey, trying to go for a similar haircut to the one Brad Pitt has in Fight Club. Plus there was the whole nu-metal spikey style lol!
haha cool
whoa theres nu metal in da uk?
that ****s american through and through, one of my fav genres
