You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Hair Transplant Without Any Treatments (finasteride, Min, ...etc)?
- Thread starter HNMB
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 70
You can do it but it won’t be as successful but it will definitely be better then nothing
- Reaction score
- 70
Look at Melvin from the Hair Transplant Network and look at his transplants, that’s about the best you can get from transplants without treatment (pretty good) unless your not destined for nw6
Look at Melvin from the Hair Transplant Network and look at his transplants, that’s about the best you can get from transplants without treatment (pretty good) unless your not destined for nw6
If you're talking about the moderator Melvin, he mentions he uses min and nizoral on his profile (unless thats old info).
Melvin is a clown. That site is biased towards any clinic that pays them to be a ‘reputable clinic’ complete con artists. If they don’t pay them then they won’t speak about them.
Anyway, back to the point - as mentioned above if your hair loss is stabilised finasteride isn’t needed. I had fue and don’t take finasteride, however do take minoxidil and some vitamins.
Anyway, back to the point - as mentioned above if your hair loss is stabilised finasteride isn’t needed. I had fue and don’t take finasteride, however do take minoxidil and some vitamins.
I've been wondering the same thing. I saw a small study (which I wasn't able to find today) suggesting finasteride helps quite significantly post-surgery with survival of grafts.
If finasteride has nothing to do with survival of grafts however, then we can probably go by how aggressive your hairloss is. Mine from age 17-30 is slow, so I might risk it.
And maybe I haven't seen bad results to go by, but hairline is always the most important to your appearance. If you lose more at the crown later on but still have a good hairline, it won't destroy your appearance overall. I do understand the hypothetical scenario of losing behind the hairline, but if you keep your hair a bit longer that wouldn't be disastrous either. Again, still better than egghead frontal view.
If finasteride has nothing to do with survival of grafts however, then we can probably go by how aggressive your hairloss is. Mine from age 17-30 is slow, so I might risk it.
And maybe I haven't seen bad results to go by, but hairline is always the most important to your appearance. If you lose more at the crown later on but still have a good hairline, it won't destroy your appearance overall. I do understand the hypothetical scenario of losing behind the hairline, but if you keep your hair a bit longer that wouldn't be disastrous either. Again, still better than egghead frontal view.
- Reaction score
- 70
How is he a clown? I’m talking about his personal transplant which he has at a norwood 6. He mentions he gets terrible sides in finasteride and has been using minoxidil on and off for years.Melvin is a clown. That site is biased towards any clinic that pays them to be a ‘reputable clinic’ complete con artists. If they don’t pay them then they won’t speak about them.
Anyway, back to the point - as mentioned above if your hair loss is stabilised finasteride isn’t needed. I had fue and don’t take finasteride, however do take minoxidil and some vitamins.