Hair Stem Cell Transplantation (In Europe)

hellouser

hellouser

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,634
That's Dr. Gho and it's been debated a ridiculous number of times over at Bald Truth Talk, so much so that Dr. Gho even sent a letter to Spencer Kobren whining about the negative speculation of whether or not the method works....

So does it work?

NO. HASCI /DR. GHO'S METHOD DOES NOT WORK.

They claim around 80% of the hair is regenerated but tell you no more procedures can be done after three sessions. Why? If you did a maximum single session, at around say, 7,000 grafts and 80% of that regenerated, you'd then have another 5,600 grafts to harvest AGAIN. At this point, you'd have a total of 7,000 + 5,600 = 12,600 grafts. That's actually enough to restore a fully bald head for good density. Given that most NW6 pattern scalp is roughly around 175cm/2 in total area, 12,600 grafts translates to 72 grafts per square centimetre which is EXCELLENT density considering hair without any male pattern baldness is typically above 80 grafts per square centimetre. This is After only TWO sessions, and they say the cut off is three.

So WHY THE FUCK have we never seen a single case of any completely bald man being fully restored? They're clearly lying.

Forget about HASCI, these guys are professional legalized scam artists.
 
B

BillButcher

New Member
Reaction score
0
I am glad I asked the question here. I must say though, initial statement of their that attracted me most, was how procedure was scarless.

I found another thread where you comment the same thing:

"The regeneration claim is clearly mostly bullsh*t. The only positive out of a HASCI procedure is that its scarless."

So, does that mean that their procedure is the same as FUE, only that it's scarless? If that's the case, I'd still go with them...?
 
hellouser

hellouser

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,634
BillButcher said:
I am glad I asked the question here. I must say though, initial statement of their that attracted me most, was how procedure was scarless.

I found another thread where you comment the same thing:

"The regeneration claim is clearly mostly bullsh*t. The only positive out of a HASCI procedure is that its scarless."

So, does that mean that their procedure is the same as FUE, only that it's scarless? If that's the case, I'd still go with them...?
Click to expand...

I would put ZERO trust into Dr. Gho at this point with all the dubious claims. Dude is entering Dr. Nigam territory.

If you want scarless, just wait for Pilofocus, at least Dr. Wesley is a credible doctor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2023 XenForo Ltd.
Top