It's not that it's less complex, it's just science that translates to scale more effectively.I feel like you are one of those babies that need to be told the same thing again and again. You might be put in time out soon. We'll go over this again Kermit, Stemson is less complex than Tsuji, its method of hair multiplication is more general. It's extracting iPSCs and differentiating them into eventual hair follicles. Tsuji is a lot more specific where hair follicles from the donor region need being multiplied, it is more complex. Secondly the Stemson team have said on more than one occasion that their targeted audience is to the wider population including kids who've lost hair at a young age. They want to implement this to the wider public and you can't do that with an insane price tag, obviously from the release date it will be pricey because it is a completely new method that's never been done before but eventually the price will come down fairly quickly. I know you will ask about the price of Stemson again in a couple of weeks so bookmark this so you can go back to it.
Tsuji needs to extract donor follicles and culture tens of thousands of follicle germs, then manually implant them. Stemson's second product won't even be using your own cells, they'll be using analogous blank iPSCs cells from cultured lines. This means that any person can walk off the street and get this done relatively quickly without a prolonged wait period for follicle development. They're also working on advancing robotics to be able to aid in the transplanting of the scaffolds which could make this process very quick for areas that are not the hairline or crown whirl pattern, but even those could be solved if they train the ML model of the robot correctly.
It's still going to be expensive, but if they do come out with similar pricing to Tsuji this will be another large scale flop. I don't think Tsuji's pricing is what it is because of the difference in complexity or effort even, I just think they want the margins of the procedure it be massive. I cannot imagine the expense to perform it could be in the 6 figures, even factoring in the surgeons labour.
Last edited: