Amusingly enough you try and play an air of superiority when you can't even correctly figure out what you're arguing.
seaback said:
You constantly deny the primordial role of genetics in processes such as hair loss despite a large body of evidence proving the opposite and your point of view is biased towards the importance of environmental factors.
Brains Expel Hair said:
Your specific combination of "you" (your mother's genes + your father's genes + any errors that occurred during meiosis + the influence of the environment that your body has been subjected to ever since you were first conceived) has just so turned out to produce hair loss.
That little formula I wrote to help the original poster understand slightly how his genes work contains 4 different factors. The primordial factors listed in that formula? DNA. But if your DNA was the only single thing that had a factor on hair loss we wouldn't need these forums. There'd be no point really, as any external factors such as even finasteride, unless I was incorrect in the post above, would have absolutely zero effect and nothing that ever happened to you after conception would change how much hair you lose. No diets, no exercise, no drugs. Fact is, I have never once said that a persons genes are not an influence or cause of hair loss. If you'd ever read what you're so haphazardly critiquing you'd know that I say quite the opposite.
My point of view is biased in that I accept the fact that there are environmental factors. This "opinion" makes me a severe outlier from many of the regular posters on this forum. This in itself is ridiculous in how limited in logical capacity it means that most of the regular posters must be. Even if we assume that there is only one single gene responsible for hair loss (which I sincerely hope you at least realize there is more) and that gene directly and only interacts with DHT, then obviously the only things that will affect hair loss will do so by affecting DHT (even though that's still too simplified). Great, I know you're all with me still since this is the same crap you guys copy and paste in each thread. Ok, so anything that has an affect on DHT in the scalp area will potentially affect hair loss right? Correct, now does that effect have to be direct or indirect? Somehow as soon as anyone starts mentioning possible indirect interactions there's always at least one of you bald "experts" chiming in about how fanciful their claims are. There's nothing to say to this besides, you're wrong. The reason you're wrong is you're just amazingly limited in your mental capacity. Hell even finasteride isn't a direct interaction. Finasteride indirectly affects DHT mediated hair loss by directly affecting 5-AR, so how come you guys can't accept the
fact that there are other factors out there that can indirectly affect hair loss?
How can you possibly hold such a fatalistic view of any aspect of human life and still claim to be a scientist or even student? Anyways, I'm glad you're getting away from needlessly harassing me. I will admit it can be frustrating to often times see so many detractors completely failing to grasp what I'm saying. It's enough for me to almost just say to hell with this place. I got what I needed, my hair is no longer oily, my hair loss stopped and my health drastically improved, mainly because I ignored the advice of people like you.
However I keep coming back and offering advice and my "flights of fancy" because of the messages I frequently receive in my inbox here from people whom I've actually managed to help. I regrettably see that if it weren't for me on here most of what they would have had to listen to were you fools claiming that everyone is equally doomed from birth.
you are so cute. I have perfectly understood this concept, I do not think that I would be doing what I am doing now if I had missed it... The hair loss character is definitely inherited and has nothing (or very little) to do with the influence of the environment