I read quite a few scandals regarding Ph.D fake research data. Interestingly, no one has ever known that the research data was bullshit until the Ph.D candidates themselves unintentionally confessed it. Back to the medicine industry, research is the core and I wonder if a same story repeat itself ???
For finasteride efficacy, it is easy since they just need to take photos that show improvement and we are all convinced.
For finasteride response rate (the stunning 80%+ response rate) and side effects (such as sexual and mental health), Merck can easily make up any number that support them, cant they ? and who the hell would know the dirty truth behind it ?
So, my little question here is, how can FDA reviewers / advisory board be certain that the trials data, provided by the pharma that sponsors the drug, are genuine and reliable ???
For finasteride efficacy, it is easy since they just need to take photos that show improvement and we are all convinced.
For finasteride response rate (the stunning 80%+ response rate) and side effects (such as sexual and mental health), Merck can easily make up any number that support them, cant they ? and who the hell would know the dirty truth behind it ?
So, my little question here is, how can FDA reviewers / advisory board be certain that the trials data, provided by the pharma that sponsors the drug, are genuine and reliable ???