eliazush said:
Bryan,
1. Taking dutasteride every day or 3.5mg a week or 14mg every month isn't always the same. Pharmacokinetics is much more complicated than a SIMPLE math. AND it's not backed up...that is, nobody (as far as I know) measured serum levels for patients who took it every day versus patients who took it once week or once a month!
You obviously haven't read and studied the available information on dutasteride. You need to read the following two studies, one of which is the same one I mentioned to "ACT1ONpack" in my post above:
"A model for the turnover of dihydrotestosterone in the presence of the irreversible 5a-reductase inhibitors GI198745 and finasteride", Gisleskog
et al, Clin Pharmacol Ther 1998;64: 636-47.
"The pharmacokinetic modelling of GI198745 (dutasteride), a compound with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination", Gisleskog
et al, J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 47, 53-58.
Please see the following graphs from the first study, which show the effects of daily, weekly, and monthly doses of dutasteride:
http://www.geocities.com/bryan50001/dutasteride2.htm
eliazush said:
2. Always, there is a threshhold when a medication won't affect...that is, higher serum levels won't always mean higher activity.
Oh, for the love of Christ. How can you say something that silly about dutasteride?? I _guarantee_ you that that dutasteride's activity in inhibiting 5a-reductase is a direct function of its level in the blood serum. Here's another graph from those studies:
http://www.geocities.com/bryan50001/dutasteride4.htm
eliazush said:
For examle, if theoretically 0.1mg a day can block ALL 5a-rductase in the body (by the way, nobody talked about half life of this enzyme, which is also important!)
These studies have THOROUGHLY discussed the half-life of the enzyme!! Eliazuh, you're WAY behind the times!
eliazush said:
...then 2mg won't do a thing because all available enzymes are "taken" by the medication. Nobody ever talked about how long the med stays attached to the enzyme.
Oh, for crying out loud...even the TITLE of the first study makes reference to the well-known fact that both finasteride and dutasteride are IRREVERSIBLE inhibitors of the type 2 enzyme! That's common knowledge! The meds stay attached PERMANENTLY.
eliazush said:
Half life only means how long it take the body to eliminate the entity not how long it works on the site..If it blocks the enzyme forever, till the enzyme is eliminated, more drug consumed won't change a thing!
You're overlooking the fact that even though finasteride and dutasteride are IRREVERSIBLE inhibitors of the type 2 enzyme, MORE of the enzyme is constantly being produced! The amount of DHT in the body is the result of sort of a "balance" between the levels of finasteride or dutasteride, their affinity for the 5a-reductase enzymes, and the production rate of more of that 5a-reductase. It takes LARGE daily doses of dutasteride to really approach 100% inhibition, more than most people would be willing to take. The common doses that are typically used are well below that level, and will produce intermediate results. Raising the typical doses will always result in more and more suppression of DHT.
eliazush said:
3. Many details are missing about these issues, so NO ONE, including you, can't claim otherwise. My claims are only theoretical based on knowledge as a pharmacist.
You may be a pharmacist, but you clearly do NOT know very much about dutasteride. Once again, I strongly recommend that you read the studies I cited above.
eliazush said:
4. I am onl assuming the dosage of dutasteride needed for hairloss should be smaller than for the prsotate, and yes, it IS based on merk studies, which show, BTW, that the connection of efficacy versus serum concentration is niglectable, that is, the difference in activity terms between 5mg of finasteride to 1mg is very small.
True. It's small, but not ZERO. The same is true for dutasteride: Glaxo's hairloss trial showed better results (haircounts) for larger doses.
eliazush said:
5. Merk may have unpure "intentions" to publish what they did, but this is the only scientific literature we all have here, so other any assumption made by you or me whould always stay "assumption". And if merk does have such intentions, why souldn't the creat 2mg for hairloss? The product will be more effective, in your opinion, and will give merk more money because they can claim for more money, because you also get twice as much of finasteride.
They had to draw the line somewhere. It's a reasonable compromise between efficacy and safety.
Bryan