Dutasteride or Finasteride with 5% Minoxidil
- Thread starter af89
- Start date
Einstein
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 110
Bryan's been around for as far back as I can remember and he's helped countless people, including myself, to the best of his ability. I've corresponded with bryan on several occasions throughout the years and not a single time has he ever suggested dr proctor's products to me considering the desperate circumstances I was in where I knowingly would've tried anything.
Calling names and insults at a veteran of his intelect and knowledge s well as contributions to the hairloss community over the course of a +decade is plain wrong.
There are only 2 logical reasons Bryan would sugguest Prox-N or Proxiphen. Either he
a) gets a commision from each sale
or
b) strongly believes in it's effectiveness
I choose to go with the latter and say he strongly believes in the products. He can make more working part-time in Mc Donalds compared to the commision he'd make on proctor's productsin all 10 years combined. Nobody uses it! It's expensive! It has no logical explanation to it whatsoever. You ask him if he thinks they work so well then why doesn't use them. He answers by saying he no longer cares as much as he once did for his hair. That's common sense, I'm 29, and if my thinning crown appeared to me at age 20 I would've eaten carpet to thicken it up. Right now, maintenance is fine with me. He also tells you the product is not within his budget at the moment, which makes sense. None of you thought twice about spending the amount of dollars you do monthly on your hair? Is everyone financially comfortable here? Perhaps he has more priorities now for his finances rather than prioritizing his hair like some of us do. Given his age and the expense of the products, I see other logical reason for him to not use proctor's products.
If bryan truely wants to push Proctor's products there are many other ways of doing so with 100x more success, but I don't see him stooping to that level.
Dudes on this forum throwing these insults are wise and have a good head on their shoulders, I'm prety cool with all of you here and on other forums where I have other usernames. So don't get insulted by what I'm saying, just merely ask you to take few steps back and analyze the situation. It doesn't look good to round up and attack one person especially based on pure speculation and assumptions.
Calling names and insults at a veteran of his intelect and knowledge s well as contributions to the hairloss community over the course of a +decade is plain wrong.
There are only 2 logical reasons Bryan would sugguest Prox-N or Proxiphen. Either he
a) gets a commision from each sale
or
b) strongly believes in it's effectiveness
I choose to go with the latter and say he strongly believes in the products. He can make more working part-time in Mc Donalds compared to the commision he'd make on proctor's productsin all 10 years combined. Nobody uses it! It's expensive! It has no logical explanation to it whatsoever. You ask him if he thinks they work so well then why doesn't use them. He answers by saying he no longer cares as much as he once did for his hair. That's common sense, I'm 29, and if my thinning crown appeared to me at age 20 I would've eaten carpet to thicken it up. Right now, maintenance is fine with me. He also tells you the product is not within his budget at the moment, which makes sense. None of you thought twice about spending the amount of dollars you do monthly on your hair? Is everyone financially comfortable here? Perhaps he has more priorities now for his finances rather than prioritizing his hair like some of us do. Given his age and the expense of the products, I see other logical reason for him to not use proctor's products.
If bryan truely wants to push Proctor's products there are many other ways of doing so with 100x more success, but I don't see him stooping to that level.
Dudes on this forum throwing these insults are wise and have a good head on their shoulders, I'm prety cool with all of you here and on other forums where I have other usernames. So don't get insulted by what I'm saying, just merely ask you to take few steps back and analyze the situation. It doesn't look good to round up and attack one person especially based on pure speculation and assumptions.
Jacob
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 44
Einstein said:
Bryan doesn't have to mention Proctor's products privately..as he does it for all to see in these forums.
While Bryan may be "knowledgeable"..he spends much of his time arguing with posters..many times over the stupidest things. All the knowledge in the world and thousands of posts does not make shilling the products for 15+ years, right.
It also makes no sense to go running around for 15+ years pushing the crap because he believes in it's effectiveness, when there is no evidence for it being that effective. He has no evidence for it- he doesn't even use it himself and hasn't for 15+ years! So the age excuse is B.S. It's too expensive for him? Funny. He doesn't even use fricken NANO shampoo. Next he'll be telling us he no longer uses ANY shampoo :woot:
Nor does Proctor have any evidence. When asked about NANO, for instance...Bryan admitted there isn't any study or __________ on it. All proctor has is the patents, which many other companies/docs/products have.
I have analyzed the situation btw. I've been doing so for years. There is no other explanation for him doing what he's been doing..for 15+ years. Calling the crap the OBVOUS choice..and all the other examples I've given the past couple of weeks. Here and elsewhere. Maybe I should list 'em all...
"If bryan truely wants to push Proctor's products there are many other ways of doing so with 100x more success, but I don't see him stooping to that level."
I would really love to know what you're referring to there. I think what he's been doing all these years has been very slick..one of the biggest shill'acking these forums have ever seen. And yet it isn't that slick..since it's so OBVIOUS.