waynakyo
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 466
Hey all,
I was browsing through internet and found these ( which you might already know of):
http://www.hairlossforum.net/library/article302.htm
http://www.hairsite8.com/misc/xxx_photo1.htm
I am surprised to find out this thing. It is actually depressing. It tells me that someone 2-3 years ago managed to do HM however, had cancer incidient on his patient [ that he called "could be related" to HM ] and had other problems.
But let's stop here and reflect for a second, this is similar to what some doctors are saying now : HM MIGHT increase the risk of cancer.
I HOPE this is not true.
I was browsing through internet and found these ( which you might already know of):
http://www.hairlossforum.net/library/article302.htm
http://www.hairsite8.com/misc/xxx_photo1.htm
I am surprised to find out this thing. It is actually depressing. It tells me that someone 2-3 years ago managed to do HM however, had cancer incidient on his patient [ that he called "could be related" to HM ] and had other problems.
But let's stop here and reflect for a second, this is similar to what some doctors are saying now : HM MIGHT increase the risk of cancer.
I HOPE this is not true.
