first of all i am amazed that we cant figure out what causes hairs to leave our heads early...we can put men on the moon...but we cant make tiny strands stay on our heads...and i dont wanna hear the dht culprit story...if it was just dht then none of us would be on this forum, wed be having nmothing but results from our finasteride and dutasteride...k point of post is ...wouldnt a company be nervous about investing millions of dollars into a procedure that would become obsolete the minute one finds how to stop the hair from falling out?...sure they would have many people in our generation as clients but it still seems like the logical answer is in finding out what the cause is as opposed to fixing it once its already happened...or have they given up on finding out why the hair goes?
Does Hair Cloning make Sense?
- Thread starter sherwood
- Start date
Fallout Boy
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 3
sherwood said:
The technology/research we have right now is way more likely to allow us to perfect the procedure of hair multiplication than to allow us to discover exactly why we go bald, and how to stop/reverse someone from going bald. HM is like different way to solve the problem known as male pattern baldness.
Just because Hair Multiplication might not be as ideal as taking one pill to stop/reverse male pattern baldness for good we shouldnt ignore HM just to chase after something that may be 60 years away (the magical male pattern baldness pill).
So yea Hair Multiplication might be obsolete in 40 years but its the best/most advanced treatment we will have IF they can perfect the procedure.
G
Guest
Guest
Anyway, HM is not gonna solve the problem.
HM is supposed to be a estetical solution only. But It will never reverse male pattern baldness from it's root.
HM is supposed to be a estetical solution only. But It will never reverse male pattern baldness from it's root.