Breyfogle
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 146
Ugh - it's going to take many lifetimes to cure this...
"
Ugh - it's going to take many lifetimes to cure this...
No one to blame but ourselves.
"It's like taking a brown plant that's all but dead and bringing it back to life again," he said.
Scrape away the dead and lay the seeds for another plant. That's what they're trying to do now.
And again, I'd like to personally fight every higher up at the FDA. There are so many adverse side effects to so many drugs that they don't recall because they're cash cows. How about a common side effect of anti-depressant medication being depression? Does that make any f*****g sense? Or any countless drug that "may cause death." It's my body, and my life; I should be allowed to roll the dice on side effects if I deem that to be appropriate, 'cosmetic' issue or not.
Any attention that Androgenetic Alopecia gets is good, but I don't get why the F they'd interview Christiano. The least they could do is focus on research that's in clinical trials, but that wouldn't give them the clickbait headline.
Nice find
"In the end, I think there are going to be multiple ways to treat male pattern baldness, and some will work fabulously well in some people and not so well in others," Cotsarelis said.
Not agree, I personaly think this disease will be resolved in our Lifetime. Be positive man, we have some pretty researchers and findings.
I am 100% with you, they resolved areta but not common baldnessI'm going to officially decide that JAK inhibitors are a complete write off. Here's why:
So the guy clearly has regular androgenic alopecia along with alopecia areata... only one alopecia was solved.
Case closed.
I'm going to officially decide that JAK inhibitors are a complete write off. Here's why:
So the guy clearly has regular androgenic alopecia along with alopecia areata... only one alopecia was solved.
Case closed.
I'm going to officially decide that JAK inhibitors are a complete write off. Here's why:
So the guy clearly has regular androgenic alopecia along with alopecia areata... only one alopecia was solved.
Case closed.
I remember we were discussing JAKs a year ago, or maybe even more and I said something like: "Wouldn't it be hilarious to take JAK inh after years of alopecia areata just to grow out a NW6" funny.
Cure is not treatment,but treatment is 100% possible only we need know its cause and so avoid develop the problem.
Ugh - it's going to take many lifetimes to cure this...
A treatment is a cure if it completely relieves the symptoms of the disease.
I see this statement all the time around here and I invite anyone to name me a disease that is cured without a "treatment". With what disease can you just use a lotion or take a pill and be cured overnight?
This is a kick in the balls.I'm going to officially decide that JAK inhibitors are a complete write off. Here's why:
So the guy clearly has regular androgenic alopecia along with alopecia areata... only one alopecia was solved.
Case closed.
This is EXACTLY what i thought would happen. Hair grows in all areas except the male pattern baldness zones. I guess if you have AA it would be fairly hard to tell if you also have male pattern baldness. Complete and utter fail for 95% of hair loss sufferers.I'm going to officially decide that JAK inhibitors are a complete write off. Here's why:
So the guy clearly has regular androgenic alopecia along with alopecia areata... only one alopecia was solved.
Case closed.
They're saying the drug has to be formulated right to penetrate deep enough to affect follicles affected by Androgenetic Alopecia. I was never banking on jak inhibitors due to how far away they seem, but i dont get the pessimism from this article alone tbh.