the pictures are totally useless. like other users mentions, only a few pilofocus-extracted follicles of course don't appear as visible empty spaces in the donor area. there are even no tattoo markings to prove the whole thing. dr wesley won't be able to do a proper analysis either. it's really laughable. on the pics we only see a random spot of donor area. nothing to see here.
and nobody even talks about how those 23 pilofocus-extracted follicles look like in the recipient area. of course dr. wesley didn't place any tattoo markings in the recipient, so nobody will ever know how those follicles turned out, let alone their shaft thickness.
it would be so damn easy to proof the whole pilofocus magic.
@nameless (aka jarjarbinx): if you really believe in pilofocus and want to know the truth, just ask wesley for the following:
take a 5 by 5 mm square in the donor area (you can also take a bigger area, like 10 by 10mm if you have the courage - but 5 by 5mm is the minimum). extract ALL hairs from this square.
place those extracted follicles all close together at one single spot in the recipient are. if the spot is totally bald, then you don't need any tattoo markings, but if it's still surrounded by other hairs, then do at least one simple small tattoo dot marking (which will fade away over time, it's not permanent).
after 6 or 12 months we will see what happens.
every other approach is useless and misleading.
time to get to the truth.
this artista-wesley BS has to stop already.
but i would of course be very happy for all of us if this experiment turns out as a success.
otherwise it's just a dr. Gho hype-scam 2.0
how dr. Gho is still in business is unbelievable to me. it's a proven scam and rip-off.