How can you comment on what hairloss researchers should and shouldn't do when you obviously have no idea what goes into these sort of research and developement endeavors? You sound like children. This would be like going into a cancer patient forum or AIDS patient forum and complaining why researchers haven't solved those problems yet and then commenting on what you (as someone who I am guessing has zero background in cancer, Aids or even hairloss research) think researchers with PhDs and highly advanced scientific knowledge should be doing. Very ignorant statements in my opinion.
Research takes time and lots of $$. DHT is a main component related to male pattern baldness and the fact that we are able to get any sort of reduction in the rate or scope of our male pattern baldness without serious side effects is actually very encouraging. There are other options but all are too dangerous because they effect your normal body chemistry too much and gov'ts conclude that they are not safe for the general population. Not to mention hair transplant.
Men lose their hair, it is a normal body function passed down for many many generations. This is not something that one would expect to easily change without serious side effects.
Sirini, finasteride in no way changes you into a woman, that's is just dumb.