Hello people,
I have an idea regarding hair transplant for young patients in their 20s, and want you to hear me out and offer your opinion.
Everyone talks about how getting an hair transplant early will screw young patients in the future because continued loss will contribute to an abnormal hairloss pattern in the non-transplanted areas of the scalp. This is completely understandable.
However, most people agree that the hairline is the most important feature of an hair transplant because it frames the face, etc. So, what if we were to get an hair transplant (let's say someone is originally a NW2 or 3 before the hair transplant) in the front, creating an ideal, mature hairline that one would be happy with forever.
It is possible, and probable, that the hair behind the hair transplant will eventually fall out, leaving a bald crown, but would that be SO bad? I mean, we'd have great heads of hair for years, especially with meds and all, we could stave that off for years. Plus, new meds, cloning, etc will eventually come out that can even further delay it.
WORST COMES TO WORST, let's say there are no new meds and the hair behind it completey goes. In the end, we would still have a perfect hairline but with no hair on the crown. (Even then, still, we could get a hairpiece that would cover that portion while the front, and most comsetically sensitive, is natural and undetectable.)
As an example, look Zinedine Zidane, famous French footballer. He's got a relatively intact hairline, and probably a NW6 everwhere else. BUT HE LOOKS ACCEPTABLE, and his loss doesn not look bad when looking at him from the front, which is the most important.
The NW6 from the back:
http://www.eurosport.com/football/worldcup/2006/sport_sto874290.shtml
The hairline from the front (shaved down):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/world_cup_2006/teams/france/5064798.stm
Please search for other picutes of Zidane if you want to get even a better perspective of what I mean. What do you guys think of this option?
I have an idea regarding hair transplant for young patients in their 20s, and want you to hear me out and offer your opinion.
Everyone talks about how getting an hair transplant early will screw young patients in the future because continued loss will contribute to an abnormal hairloss pattern in the non-transplanted areas of the scalp. This is completely understandable.
However, most people agree that the hairline is the most important feature of an hair transplant because it frames the face, etc. So, what if we were to get an hair transplant (let's say someone is originally a NW2 or 3 before the hair transplant) in the front, creating an ideal, mature hairline that one would be happy with forever.
It is possible, and probable, that the hair behind the hair transplant will eventually fall out, leaving a bald crown, but would that be SO bad? I mean, we'd have great heads of hair for years, especially with meds and all, we could stave that off for years. Plus, new meds, cloning, etc will eventually come out that can even further delay it.
WORST COMES TO WORST, let's say there are no new meds and the hair behind it completey goes. In the end, we would still have a perfect hairline but with no hair on the crown. (Even then, still, we could get a hairpiece that would cover that portion while the front, and most comsetically sensitive, is natural and undetectable.)
As an example, look Zinedine Zidane, famous French footballer. He's got a relatively intact hairline, and probably a NW6 everwhere else. BUT HE LOOKS ACCEPTABLE, and his loss doesn not look bad when looking at him from the front, which is the most important.
The NW6 from the back:
http://www.eurosport.com/football/worldcup/2006/sport_sto874290.shtml
The hairline from the front (shaved down):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/world_cup_2006/teams/france/5064798.stm
Please search for other picutes of Zidane if you want to get even a better perspective of what I mean. What do you guys think of this option?