Well you must be pretty lucky if you can go for a year without treatments and not know whether you're losing hair, because people with aggressive hair loss can visibly worsen even in a 1-2 month time span.
Heh, the problem with this minoxidil + needling approach and getting results is always the question of "For how long?"
Like throwing a shot of gasoline on a dying fire, it'll keep it burning for a while longer, but ultimately, it's over without AA's.
On the contrary, I am more comfortable being NW3 at 30 than when I was NW3 at 23. It still looks bad but at least there's a lot more poor motherfuckers out there my age who look the same. When I was 23 I literally felt like a freak with that hairline.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
The simpler and more likely answer is that in both absolute and relative terms, there just aren't that many people researching hair loss. And of those who are, what you see is the best they've got.
Which for me is...
I am definitely interested and I'm probably not the only one around these parts. If it works as well as Finasteride (possible) without side effects (this is really the part I'm skeptical about), then it will definitely find its buyers.
What I don't get is how exactly this can be legally...
https://www.hairlosstalk.com/interact/threads/serum-paroxonase-1-level-may-be-an-indicator-and-predictor-of-the-severity-of-androgenetic-alopecia.135815/
We know.
Yes, but it's a brand new molecule, and drug design isn't foolproof, in the sense that drugs sometimes do undesirable things they weren't meant to do... Case in point, enzalutamide might give you seizures through its GABA antagonism, so you'd have awful side effects, and that doesn't guarantee...