Recent content by MeDK

Yes must be lack of knowledge. To compare a company with another who actually done human trials. What is it tsuji and stemson have done? Thats right only tested on animals. And have been spending years to come to that. And tsuji was set on the back burner for how many years after those animal...

i'm being a realist. Replicel have been Human trials. And just now they have finished their dispute with Shiseido, and Replicel also had to change their supply chain after clinical trials, and formula and so on. It would be beyond optimistic to think that Stemson would have it all done within...

We have to see it happen. There is no smooth sailing with clinical trials. And Tsuji have been underway for many years also. So he is way beyond his 7 years also.

How should it be faster? Have you read the article you gave a link to? they started in year 2000, in year 2012 they started on animals, the first HUMAN trials was in the end of 2021. After more than two decades, they haven't even been close to commercializing their treatment. So how can it...

Well show me a treatment like that, which keeps all the deadlines. Especially the clinical trials that runs like they expected them to do. How long did it take Stemson to come to this point, from idea to be done with the animal study?

I would think we are closer to 2040, than 2030.

It means if the stars align, the clinical trails will start in 2026, and then time will tell how it goes after a year or so, and then they analyze the data and should be showing how the results are, so maybe in 2028 we know how phase 1 went.

Because you don't know the long term side effects. Something might show it would be working great at first, and then it starts to develop cancer or other aggressive mutations. It's better to be alive than dead. And mutations is one of the hurdles with regenerative medicine.

A lawsuit, which a company of that size can't overcome. And then the requirements from all other governments around the world. But of course, it would give us results that we actually need. We don't need animal trails, because if they where conclusive, then we would have cured multiple diseases...

They do it to set themself up to success. And to keep themself attractive to investors for their science projects they have to show they are successful, whether or not it can be commercialized is different thing.

Replicel is on Phase 3 with RCH-01

well someone already had an early start for the whole "designer baby" approach

Sure you can force human into a certain direction, just like when we breed other animals, humans aren't different in that way. We are all animals. So why not breed people with only good hair. But for now we have to settle with autologous and allogenic transplants as the "lastest of the greatest".

Crispr is a technique and still not a treatment, it makes no sense what you are point out. Crispr is a "dna scissor" not a treatment, you wouldn't call scissors a treatment would you? I think you don't understand the term "industrialized". And now that we have established that crispr is a "dna...

crispr is never going to be industrialized, it have been written in many papers. And yes cripsr with unveiled in 2012, but have of course been underway many years before that. But crispr is gene editing you literally go in and edit in the DNA string. Its a method, not a treatment.