Recent content by Footy

  1. F

    Bryan, what do u think of this crazy theory??

    I think that topical androgen receptor blockers like spironolactone, won't effect beard growth because the androgen receptors that `matter' in hair growth are out of the reach of spironolactone. spironolactone has been shown to do it's job in effecting surface androgen receptors in sebaceous glands, so there is no...
  2. F

    For bryan and Foote.

    This is something i want to try to get done. There is some interest from a group who are involved in lympedema research, and i am working on generating further interest. There is an electrical resistence test, that is suppose to be able to tell small differences in tissue fluid levels. I also...
  3. F

    For bryan and Foote.

    I fully understand the concept, my theory was developed using the principles of Ockhams razor. The problem you have is the term `Ockhams razor' was just something you found on Google, and you thought you would use it here to try to impress people! You have now made it very clear to everyone...
  4. F

    A tantalizing POTENTIAL for full regrowth?? Hmmm...

    This is a very important study, as it really cannot be explained by the current theory of androgen related hair growth/loss. 8) The current theory says the male pattern baldness follicles respond in the way they do to androgens, because of an all `internal' programing. Well if such is the case, this internal...
  5. F

    For bryan and Foote.

    Again, for the third time now, i will ask you to explain your statement that Ockhams razor refutes my theory? If you want to be taken seriously here, just back up your arrogant psuedo scientific talk with some `REAL' science :wink: S Foote.
  6. F

    A tantalizing POTENTIAL for full regrowth?? Hmmm...

    Bryan. Please re- post this in the experimental forum, and i'll tell you what is happening here! :wink: S Foote.
  7. F

    Bryan, what do u think of this crazy theory??

    I did look look for your usual duplicate post here Bryan, on the forum here designed for `study debates'. I also looked on the first page here, but didn't see anything. As you can see from the reaction, people on this forum have other priorities! Getting back to the topic here, i can't...
  8. F

    Bryan, what do u think of this crazy theory??

    I know, i know :lol: This is why i asked Bryan to post about that study in the experimental forum OK :wink: S Foote.
  9. F

    For bryan and Foote.

    You just cant replicate such a contact inhibition aspect in-vitro Michael. The in-vitro tests we have been talking about, concern cell cultures and not `whole' follicles. I wish we could do such an experiment! I do relate to your argument above that DHT can be too much of a good thing. We...
  10. F

    For bryan and Foote.

    Michael. The important point i am trying to get across here, is about a common assumption, refered to in your statement above quote: "Have got to be honest guys, all of these papers seemed to indicate that basically androgen inception on the dermal papilla makes terminal hairs in the scalp...
  11. F

    Bryan, what do u think of this crazy theory??

    It's funny how you like to have the odd dig at me in these threads Bryan, but i have to thank you for continuing to post studies that support my theory, even when they refute yours :wink: Very sporting of you i must say. Your latest contribution is at your `safe haven' of Farrels censored...
  12. F

    For bryan and Foote.

    So you are conceding this important point then Bryan! Just to be sure i will ask you one last time, as you haven't answered my question Bryan! How can you explain the long term balding in the larger(over 3mm) grafts, transplanted to the balding scalp, as anything other than a continuation...
  13. F

    For bryan and Foote.

    OK Bryan, you want to do this the hard way lets do it. I have explained this point to you over and over, it is all related to the long period {many years} of the human hair cycle. Others reading these threads have `got' the point of my argument, but you haven't (apparently)? :wink: So now i...
  14. F

    For bryan and Foote.

    OK bigmouth, enough of your sad posing here :roll: You raised the principle of Ockhams razor and claimed it refutes my theory. But we are all still waiting for you to tell us `exactly' how Ockhams razor refutes my theory? I also asked you to tell us how the current theory you support...
Top