If I would have this kind of info (the kind of info that Mike Hunt has) , I would fly over to Sicily, hunt this dude down, take pics of his head, ask him to provide old (before) pics, fly back home and post them here.
I got my hands on a batch of this stuff a while ago.
Didn't do much for me other than make my head shrink to create the illusion of more hair.
My mother didn't recognise me anymore and I spent christmas alone with my dog.
I'm still watching but wanted to say here that Trump just "attacked" the FDA head on by stating that the procedures to get meds to market are far too cumbersome and he wants to "speed up" the process.
This is my loose memory of what he said
If someone has the entire accurate transcript be sure...
Oh noes. You're one of those people.
So. Let's try get this back on topic before you have to count beyond 5) to make your points.
At least you agree with me that the "5 year hair back" claim was something a reputable doctor shouldn't have said. Even if anecdotal. Not in these early stages at...
It's theoretically not relevant, sure. Many things are theoretically not relevant.
A logical human reaction after all the failed products we've seen over the years (sidenote: that have produced similar pictures and have made these type of early stage bald/bold claims (5 year loss-reversal)...
I would be in favour of that.
It's more constructive than the groundhog day principle of annoying people with disappointing outcomes. Nobody needs that in their lives.
It's not always helpful to make your own summary of what someone said, just to make it look like you are right about something. It's not very constructive.
It's a very shortcut approach to what I've said, leaving out the reasons why I dragged my joindate into this. (the point that you pick out...
:D
Check my join-date (and this is not even the first forum I joined)
In light of that, I'm just really really at the end of my goodwill and excitement.
In fact, I ran out about 5 years ago after product nr x that had everyone hyped, pictures turned out to be taken with a potato and product x...
I'll explain.
There's nothing wrong with the quality of the screenshots. It's only the pictures that stand out and seem to be coming straight out of 1982. Even the ad (a bit more towards the end of the article) has better quality than the before/after pics.
That + I don't need the pics in...