That's basically what i'm saying. though i am not sure exactly how much it costs - it may not even be that much for those with access to research institutions. Bioengineering researchers have access to these tools such as CRISPR for gene therapy/modification in mice but the concept has been proven in humans already. I have to believe it is only a matter of time before one of those people goes rogue and tries it on themselves by using good donor DNA that contains a good AR gene.
This kind of thing is so appealing, and so goddamn certain to provide the cure that it makes me want to get a Biological Engineering degree just so i could have access to these tools and get this sh*t done myself; it'd be quicker than waiting for regulations.
Here's the abbreviated "evil" plan:
- gain access to institution with CRISPR technology
- produce vector with healthy AR gene
- self-inject
Step 4: Start a thread on internet hair loss forum. Post no evidence of extraordinary claim.
Step 5: Disappear.
Step 6: Organize startup with Dr. Nigam?
I'm not under any obligation to explain things; the information is freely available online - study up and then join the conversation. If you are educated on the subject and would rather explain why gene therapy wouldn't work, then by all means knock yourself out. I'd love to hear the logic behind your dismissiveness of this approach.
All except baldness, lol.i highly believe in gene therapy. i think 5 years ago, with the finding of CRISPR, together with the developed knowledge around iPS cells, a new era of modern medicine started, the future medicine endgame if you will. controlling the genes means controlling the very basics of biology and living organisms, down to basically the smallest building blocks of life.
with CRISPR and iPS sooner or later ALL diseases will be solved. in the next 10 to 20 years we will see unbelievable breakthroughs and cures. most cancer types will be cured with CRISPR-aided immune therapy in 20 years max.
also HIV, parkinson and others will be easy treatments soon.