medmax84 said:
Awesome. So you have a degree in pharmacology?
It may be like killing an ant with a shotgun (also causes collateral damage sometimes), but using topical DHT-inhibitors may be akin to trying to kill a rhino with a BB gun. It's difficult to make substances bioavailable through the epidermis. The top layer of your skin is anuclear cells and keratin. It's not an easy medium for absorption. The point of its architecture is to prevent foreign substances from invading. This is in sharp contrast to your GI/circulatory system whose job is to ingest substances, spread them throughout the body, and absorb them into target tissues.
So yes, it's excessive and causes collateral damage (adverse reactions) but it is far more effective than rubbing ointment on your head.
Other treatments such as minoxidil are aided by the fact that they are vasodilators, which means that as they are absorbed they facilitate further exchange through the skin.
actually yes, i'm in pre-pharm currently and i will be transferring to pharmacy school next year. i'm glad that you could notice.
the problem is i think most people in this forum have the idea in their heads that DHT is a BAD thing... It is not, it merely triggers male pattern baldness if you're genetically prone to it anyway. Blame genetics if you absolutely need an excuse. I can't see how inhibiting DHT systematically is a good thing especially when it has so many other uses, and the 5 alpha reductase enzyme is used for so many more things than even we are aware of at this point.
my advice for most people here is either to find a way to block the androgen receptors locally, or go bald with grace. what's the risk of feminizing your body/ becoming a retard mentally if you have "semi"-decent hair?