- Reaction score
- 96
This thread is for any questions regarding CB-03-01 or CB-03-11, Winlevi or Breezula, and side effects reported.
1). There a few things I'd like to say about this drug. But first, can anyone verify these results as legitimate?
I found them on hairlosshelp and some other hair forum site from years back, but not on Cosmo's or Cassiopeia's websites. I've been basing my anticipation for the drug on these results, and looking for their source through an image to source search engine didn't yeild anything, so stop me if these aren't legit.
I have a few reasons why, if accurate, CB could fit a niche of hairloss treatment that is absolutely necessary to full hair regeneration. I think many of you would be content to have hair on your head, even if it wasn't particularly long or thick. That's something right? Personally though, I previously had long thick hair and would like to see myself return to that, I know others would as well. The thing is, as I explained in a recent thread, the donor DSC cells or donor stem cells or donor whatever cells are only going to be so strong; and the hairs they clone to other parts of your head will only be that strong as well. If you want better donor hair, you'd need to improve that hair as well. The only way to do this that I can think of would be a combination of Wnt stimulators and DHT inhibitors, the best of which should be CB-03-01/11. You'd have to use a periodical stimulant (Histogen if it works), or a drug applied constantly. Other than that, improving donor hair would require editing the cells themselves through something like CRISPR or other gene therapies.
2). Anti-androgens are at this point on the hair loss timeline, essential to healthy donor hair. The best anti-androgen in the works, one of the few drugs that actually binds to the hair follicle receptors, and likely the only drug like this of the next decade, is currently CB.
3). If you look at the results in the table above...despite some mediocre hair count results in CB's other tests, CB appears to MASSIVELY magnify hair thickness, it more then doubles it. Hair count is important, but let's say EVERY hair on your head doubled in diameter.
You now have twice as much hair on your head, without a single new hair follicle.
4). Winlevi (CB-03-01), is supposed to be available years before Breezula (CB-03-11), but the chemical is the same. Winlevi is a 1% concentration, Breezula is a 5% concentration.
However, as you can see, the 1% concentration in the table above is basically as effective as 5%, which theoretically means people could be using Winlevi for hair loss before 2020. The wait is not necessarily >5 years like everyone thought it was. This 1% concentration more than doubled hair diameter, that's pretty f*****g good.
These are some of the reasons I think CB is still hugely important. Other drugs like it are sure to be made available later in our lives, but the drug approval process will probably make CB the only drug like this of next decade, the only drug thet can reasonably restrict dht in all hair, donor hair too.
5). Since I think drugs like CB will be necessary until gene editing, I've been very worried reading about its side effects. If you have experienced side effects from CB, feel free to post them here. We need to know the potential side effects before we go into this, we can't have a post-CB epidemic.
Thanks for reading.
1). There a few things I'd like to say about this drug. But first, can anyone verify these results as legitimate?
I found them on hairlosshelp and some other hair forum site from years back, but not on Cosmo's or Cassiopeia's websites. I've been basing my anticipation for the drug on these results, and looking for their source through an image to source search engine didn't yeild anything, so stop me if these aren't legit.
I have a few reasons why, if accurate, CB could fit a niche of hairloss treatment that is absolutely necessary to full hair regeneration. I think many of you would be content to have hair on your head, even if it wasn't particularly long or thick. That's something right? Personally though, I previously had long thick hair and would like to see myself return to that, I know others would as well. The thing is, as I explained in a recent thread, the donor DSC cells or donor stem cells or donor whatever cells are only going to be so strong; and the hairs they clone to other parts of your head will only be that strong as well. If you want better donor hair, you'd need to improve that hair as well. The only way to do this that I can think of would be a combination of Wnt stimulators and DHT inhibitors, the best of which should be CB-03-01/11. You'd have to use a periodical stimulant (Histogen if it works), or a drug applied constantly. Other than that, improving donor hair would require editing the cells themselves through something like CRISPR or other gene therapies.
2). Anti-androgens are at this point on the hair loss timeline, essential to healthy donor hair. The best anti-androgen in the works, one of the few drugs that actually binds to the hair follicle receptors, and likely the only drug like this of the next decade, is currently CB.
3). If you look at the results in the table above...despite some mediocre hair count results in CB's other tests, CB appears to MASSIVELY magnify hair thickness, it more then doubles it. Hair count is important, but let's say EVERY hair on your head doubled in diameter.
You now have twice as much hair on your head, without a single new hair follicle.
4). Winlevi (CB-03-01), is supposed to be available years before Breezula (CB-03-11), but the chemical is the same. Winlevi is a 1% concentration, Breezula is a 5% concentration.
However, as you can see, the 1% concentration in the table above is basically as effective as 5%, which theoretically means people could be using Winlevi for hair loss before 2020. The wait is not necessarily >5 years like everyone thought it was. This 1% concentration more than doubled hair diameter, that's pretty f*****g good.
These are some of the reasons I think CB is still hugely important. Other drugs like it are sure to be made available later in our lives, but the drug approval process will probably make CB the only drug like this of next decade, the only drug thet can reasonably restrict dht in all hair, donor hair too.
5). Since I think drugs like CB will be necessary until gene editing, I've been very worried reading about its side effects. If you have experienced side effects from CB, feel free to post them here. We need to know the potential side effects before we go into this, we can't have a post-CB epidemic.
Thanks for reading.