Suggestion for Gardener, moderators and admin

[techprof]

Of late, there have been many posts saying this product works wonders for thickening, this regimen rocks, this regimen sucks, propecia sucks/works etc.
It will be great if we can know the current and past Norwood level of the posters. Just like the regimen, perhaps include a tab/bar for indicating the current and past Norwood level (before treatment). This will really put things in the perspective.
What works wonders for Norwood 1.1 will not work for NW5 in thickening. Similarly NW5 will be happy to go to NW4, whereas NW1.1 cannot go to NW1.
Thanks
techprof

 

[Johnny24601]

re:

This does not work because we will be depending on people making biased judgements as to where they are on the norwood scale. Photos are the only solution.

 

[techprof]

Johny, I agree with you. But something is better than nothing.
Most of us post pictures and know where we are at approximately.

 

[jeffsss]

Re: re:

This does not work because we will be depending on people making biased judgements as to where they are on the norwood scale. Photos are the only solution.

also, diffuse thinners dont have much of a Norwood.

 

[techprof]

jeffs,
one can say NW2, diffuse in NW4 pattern.

 

[Aplunk1]

That's true...

I would use the Norwood-scale to apply to my profile/posts if I could.

 

[kosmo]

its not a bad idea. although it might not always be accurate. but the more information we can share, the better.

 

[Axon]

I brought this to HairLossTalk.com's attention.

 

[techprof]

aplunk and kosmo, thanks for your support.
Axon thanks your attention.
techprof