SimpsonKnight
Member
- Reaction score
- 0
Is that an accurate assessment? I am quite illiterate on this subject so please correct me wherever I need correcting. I just want to make sure I have the facts straight regarding hormones and male pattern baldness. So DHT is basically the male sex hormone. Its responsible for forming the male reproductive system in the fetal stage as well as secondary characteristics such as facial hair later on in life. Therefore when people say "testosterone" they are actually referring to DHT which is the specific form of testosterone that maintains a man's male features. There are other forms of testosterone but they are not relevant to male pattern baldness. DHT is also what causes male pattern baldness because of some sort of genetic defect which causes an individual's hair follicles to react negatively to the presence of DHT and basically die. Propecia and similar medications decrease the amounts of DHT in the body by preventing the free, unspecialized testosterone from transforming into DHT. This of course makes sense.
Because it is DHT that causes hair loss would it then be accurate to say that men with very aggressive male pattern baldness and especially those who encounter it early on in life generally have high levels of DHT? Therefor they would also have very prominent secondary sexual characteristics such as a lot of facial hair of significant muscle mass? While men with low or medium-low levels of DHT, basically those who do not have very prominent secondary sexual characteristics such as facial hair and muscle mass, are a lot less likely to face aggressive hair loss?
Anyways, if someone could read this over and get back to me that would very, very awesome.
Because it is DHT that causes hair loss would it then be accurate to say that men with very aggressive male pattern baldness and especially those who encounter it early on in life generally have high levels of DHT? Therefor they would also have very prominent secondary sexual characteristics such as a lot of facial hair of significant muscle mass? While men with low or medium-low levels of DHT, basically those who do not have very prominent secondary sexual characteristics such as facial hair and muscle mass, are a lot less likely to face aggressive hair loss?
Anyways, if someone could read this over and get back to me that would very, very awesome.
