Email to Dr. Razack (Developed Crinagen):
Hello,
I was wondering if you could comment on the following:
TJ asked: "Dr. Khadavi(Developed Revivogen), I'v noticed that the makers of Crinagen have copied the Revivogen formula by adding fatty acids such as GLA, ALA, etc. Thus, Revivogen and Crinagen appear to be pretty much the same thing now. However, Crinagen is much cheaper. Could you please explain this situation? On the one hand, Crinagen is cheaper. On the other hand, Revivogen is the original formula. I'm not too sure which product I want to go with so I'd appreciate it if you could explain what's going on here. Many thanks. TJ"
Dr. Alex A Khadavi, MD answered: "We originally developed the fatty acid topical formula and had many people try to duplicate the formula. However, since we have a special delivery system that delivers the active ingredients to the hair root, our product is the only effective topical fatty acid formula. Additionally, the delivery system makes the product much more expensive to manufacturer."
Is there a way to prove these claims or disprove them?
Thanks,
Response email:
Dear Mr:
Thank you for your inquiry.
Actually, the original version of Crinagen existed before Revivogen (with a similar formula) existed. We believe that we were the ones that were initially "copied." But, we make no claims about this because all of the information needed to create either mixture is available in medical literature. We added ALA and GLA and other components present in our latest version when Dr. Razack found medical literature supporting their use.
We explored the "delivery system" (known as liposome encapsulation) that Dr. Khadavi mentions. It is definitely expensive to produce. But, we believe that simply increasing the quantities of GLA and ALA and other fatty acids when producing the current version of Crinagen gets as much of those components into hair follicles as would a liposome delivery system. Also, by not using liposomes, we are able to use more of the substances that would cause liposome breakdown.
We like Revivogen. People find it and use it and some of them like it. Then, they find Crinagen and find that it is somewhat less expensive and does the same thing for them.
Also, no other company matches our guarantee: no-time-limit refunds for the first two orders of any of our products.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Bob
Bob Maslanka
mailto:sales@raztec.com
Oh, just in case, I don't work for any of these people. It's part of my research.
Hello,
I was wondering if you could comment on the following:
TJ asked: "Dr. Khadavi(Developed Revivogen), I'v noticed that the makers of Crinagen have copied the Revivogen formula by adding fatty acids such as GLA, ALA, etc. Thus, Revivogen and Crinagen appear to be pretty much the same thing now. However, Crinagen is much cheaper. Could you please explain this situation? On the one hand, Crinagen is cheaper. On the other hand, Revivogen is the original formula. I'm not too sure which product I want to go with so I'd appreciate it if you could explain what's going on here. Many thanks. TJ"
Dr. Alex A Khadavi, MD answered: "We originally developed the fatty acid topical formula and had many people try to duplicate the formula. However, since we have a special delivery system that delivers the active ingredients to the hair root, our product is the only effective topical fatty acid formula. Additionally, the delivery system makes the product much more expensive to manufacturer."
Is there a way to prove these claims or disprove them?
Thanks,
Response email:
Dear Mr:
Thank you for your inquiry.
Actually, the original version of Crinagen existed before Revivogen (with a similar formula) existed. We believe that we were the ones that were initially "copied." But, we make no claims about this because all of the information needed to create either mixture is available in medical literature. We added ALA and GLA and other components present in our latest version when Dr. Razack found medical literature supporting their use.
We explored the "delivery system" (known as liposome encapsulation) that Dr. Khadavi mentions. It is definitely expensive to produce. But, we believe that simply increasing the quantities of GLA and ALA and other fatty acids when producing the current version of Crinagen gets as much of those components into hair follicles as would a liposome delivery system. Also, by not using liposomes, we are able to use more of the substances that would cause liposome breakdown.
We like Revivogen. People find it and use it and some of them like it. Then, they find Crinagen and find that it is somewhat less expensive and does the same thing for them.
Also, no other company matches our guarantee: no-time-limit refunds for the first two orders of any of our products.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Bob
Bob Maslanka
mailto:sales@raztec.com
Oh, just in case, I don't work for any of these people. It's part of my research.