- Reaction score
- 4,602
He will fill in the rest of the hair you will needIf they can get back full head of hair, it's a cure!!
And what will happen for Tsuji?
He will fill in the rest of the hair you will needIf they can get back full head of hair, it's a cure!!
And what will happen for Tsuji?
if you understand the science behind replicel you know that what they are creating is in theory the cure to those who still have follicles; essentially they would provide DHT "immunity" to follicles so that your whole scalp behaves like the safe donor area. This is expected to be long lasting, though i wouldn't dismiss the possibility of it having to be done a few times or every few years. For those without follicles, it will require supplemental treatment (probably Tsuji) to resolve the problem.
if you understand the science behind replicel you know that what they are creating is in theory the cure to those who still have follicles; essentially they would provide DHT "immunity" to follicles so that your whole scalp behaves like the safe donor area. This is expected to be long lasting, though i wouldn't dismiss the possibility of it having to be done a few times or every few years. For those without follicles, it will require supplemental treatment (probably Tsuji) to resolve the problem.
I think I do understand the science and I see 3 problems with Replicel:
1. Like DP cells sheath cells may also not turn into hair unless they can find a way to protect hair producing qualities in the cells.
2. The follicle has to be in anagen in order for the injected cells to grow hair
3. Only some of the cells will land on the right place in the follicle. The rest of the cells will slip downward in-between follicles.
They should do follow-up injections a few months apart to see if that will induce more follicles to produce hairs. If they aren't trying to do that then they're fools.
I can't find a .gif that accurately demonstrates my reaction to this post.
@SwoopSo Lee Buckler has been doing a lot of interviews lately and you can email him directly about setting one up.
I'm not saying this site should do one
But this site should totally do one
1. I have no idea what you mean
2. I've not found any info that indicates that would be the case
3. There are millions of cells per dose and the final treatment will be many doses with the dermal injector so I'd say that's unlikely
And Shiseido's trials involve 3 different groups.
Single treatment, followup injections and placebo
@Swoop
we need an interview ASAP pls
the first question should be
1. Do they still believe in a fullhead cure through their treatment?
if yes then that's great
2. If no, then what is the maximum benefit we can expect from this treatment?
i mean we expect detail answers like -
1. increase in density.
2. crown regrowth
3. regrowth in mid portion
4. donor regeneration ( just a thought)
5. regrowth in completely slick bald areas
6. possibility in hairline formation
7. if not any of these then can they promise us maintenance at least?
just tell him to mark those points which his product can achieve according to the data they have now at present.
/* ignore this post if u don't find it necessary*/
@Swoop
we need an interview ASAP pls
the first question should be
1. Do they still believe in a fullhead cure through their treatment?
if yes then that's great
2. If no, then what is the maximum benefit we can expect from this treatment?
i mean we expect detail answers like -
1. increase in density.
2. crown regrowth
3. regrowth in mid portion
4. donor regeneration ( just a thought)
5. regrowth in completely slick bald areas
6. possibility in hairline formation
7. if not any of these then can they promise us maintenance at least?
just tell him to mark those points which his product can achieve according to the data they have now at present.
/* ignore this post if u don't find it necessary*/
Sorry if I'm misinterpreting this, but how doesn't this demonstrate that it's not a disease and that you should just shave it off if it increases the risk of prostate cancer threefold? Excuse me if I'm being a blind idiot, because there is certainly that chance.
God damn. Can't imagine what it'll be like to not have to worry about this bull sh*t anymore. Started balding about 2.5 years ago. Let us hope all we need to do is hold the line for the next few years and then we'll finally have an escape from this hell.
Increased risk of prostate cancer doesn't mean that baldness itself is a disease.
It means that balding men are a different population than non-balding men in multiple ways. For example, one possibility is that the sensitivity of the hair follicles is not an independent variable. The same genes that make you bald likely also act elsewhere in the body.
There is in fact an error in hormone balacing or an error in ar expression that causes prostatae cancer as well as balding.
Balding and prostatae cancer correlate apparently strongly and have a in fact the same thearapy.
So controlling the hormones with finasteride might actually reduce the risk of prostatae cancer?
-edit- turns out its not that simple...
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa030660#t=article
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22289613
It seems quite a common theme to have amazing regrowth and bad sides at the same time. Or to be complete non responder. So maybe balding is really more about balancing out the hormones for our specific receptor expression.
Problem is even Dht is not one hormone, but actually four similar molecular compounds, so it's not trivial.