No cure?

RalphyWiggum

RalphyWiggum

Established Member
Reaction score
0
Stingray said:
He's actually correct though. Hair on humans is no longer necessary. Ever since man lived in shelters and learned to wear clothing... hair's only purpose was cosmetic. So, when an organ is no longer necessary, it is systematically phased out. Our appendix was once used hundreds of thousands of years ago (we assume to digest berry seeds and husks)...but since man learned to cultivate... they're only use is to line the pockets of surgeons.

Word.
Click to expand...

OH GOD HERE WE GO AGAIN,

Natural Selection is Survival based. Hair on your scalp has nothing to do with surviving long enough to produce offspring (especially considering our ancestor reproduced in their teens). male pattern baldness is most likely the result of some point mutation that evetually became a polymorphism (recurring genetic mutation in the genome). So actually you and Drop Ded Pissed on my leg president nixon are wrong.
 
D

drinkrum

Senior Member
Reaction score
1
This one is for flux.

I've always thought that the "LaserComb" was a complete gimmick -- but since you're using it, and you're pretty level-minded, what's the scoop?

D.
 
Stingray

Stingray

Senior Member
Reaction score
2
Kay...When did I say anything about natural selection? Natural selection causes human evolution...but not all evolution is caused by natural selection. Prove me wrong and I'll admit defeat. But if you can't back up your statements with anything more than what you said... I'll hold to my guns.

It's a battle of wits...yet strangely reminiscent of an *** kicking contest between 2 guys with only one leg apiece.
 
sonero9

sonero9

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
8
There are more important topics for researching, according to scientists.
 
Mitko1

Mitko1

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
480
It's 17 years old yet. They know the real cause of hair loss but they hide it because they need to sell finasteride, minoxidil, hair transplant etc...

I strongly believe that it is caused by neck tightness or poor posture or anything that can cause continious chronic neck tension that never ends.

If this is true decompresing your neck and fixing your posture must be the cure. I still don't know If the body can recover itself from calcification and fibrosis or you must do dermaroler and scalp massage after that. But If my theory is true that must be the cure because it will remove the disease completely from the patients.
 
Mitko1

Mitko1

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
480
NorwoodingMyWay said:
Because it doesn't make any logical sense. If "posture" was the core problem, why would blocking DHT halt hairloss ??

Try using your brain, it's free.
Click to expand...

If you want to understand what is the role of DHT in male pattern baldness read this:

The DHT increases in the scalp as an anti-inflammatory response because the mechanical tension on the galea which propagates through the myofascia from your neck muscles which are in chronic tension due to forward head posture. Since it can't reduce the inflammation it stays there for too long causing calcification and fibrosis - two progressive and hard to reverse conditions.

If you don't believe right now I stay in front of the entry of a hypermarket and can make a VIDEO to proove that balding men have poor posture.
 
K

karatekid

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
601
I wonder what makes a person in his right mind to just come up with 'a theory' about a subject that been researched for years by scientist, doctors and companies. What make you think you can have any added value in this subject? not even talking about having a 'theory'. Did you learn medicine? Do you have phd? Did you research hairloss for several years? Do you have studies? Did you do statistics on a large scale and derive the proper conclusions while isolating all the factors that have impact?
Or all you ever did is standing near a Walmart and counting bald heads?
 
Mitko1

Mitko1

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
480
karatekid said:
I wonder what makes a person in his right mind to just come up with 'a theory' about a subject that been researched for years by scientist, doctors and companies. What make you think you can have any added value in this subject? not even talking about having a 'theory'. Did you learn medicine? Do you have phd? Did you research hairloss for several years? Do you have studies? Did you do statistics on a large scale and derive the proper conclusions while isolating all the factors that have impact?
Or all you ever did is standing near a Walmart and counting bald heads?
Click to expand...

I already said that they probably know the real cause of hair loss but they hide it.

I found this website:
https://tmdocclusion.com/

And then I looked at bald heads on the street.

And this theory sounds most logical to me. I can't hink of other reasons why people go bald. There must be something going on on the galea aponeurotica and probably on the other places of the body , something chronic and for years.

I believe that the underlying causes of many diseases that today's medicine can't cure is PHYSICAL and not chemical . They think that if someone has a disease they have to treat it with pills and medicaton, but pills can't fix the underlying physical cause.

My next research will be about gut health and hair loss and vitamin suplementation and nutrition's impact on hair growth and male pattern baldness.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2023 XenForo Ltd.
Top