Me/SOD's/Nanogen/Nanogaine B/Prox-n Website & Products

Blondilocks

Established Member
Reaction score
0
After evaluating the alternatives to propecia, i'm left a little bewildered im clealry losing the fight regardless of having been on rogaine foam for over a year and nizoral for the same length of time, any oral DHT herbal, or other leaves me with sides, also im not sure whether if im hypoadrogen sensitive, or really whats going on but regardless to say im not a simple case, of take finasteride you'l be ok!

Tried and failed on:

Xandorx 15plus
Green tea, soy isoflavons and black tea
Propecia

Considering:

I cant find any God damn pictures to support Prox-n regardles of the one on the website a marketing gimmick, and then i stumbled on Nanogen who have an impressive website, and a whole host of products, but i really have no idea whats a scam or not anymore, anyway can someone please just show me some evidence that SOD's nanogain, prox-n is grounded on good merit and worth the hefty investment. The nanogen website for its penaz has no pictures!

Advice someone, temple has almost gone!
 

pproctor

Established Member
Reaction score
2
Blondilocks said:
I cant find any God damn pictures to support Prox-n regardles of the one on the website a marketing gimmick, and then i stumbled on Nanogen who have an impressive website, and a whole host of products, but i really have no idea whats a scam or not anymore, anyway can someone please just show me some evidence that SOD's nanogain, prox-n is grounded on good merit and worth the hefty investment. The nanogen website for its penaz has no pictures!

Advice someone, temple has almost gone!

It is true that our website is somewhat primitive. I am always intending to spiff it up. Remember, it is relatively easy to make a pretty good looking website. Developing products that actually stimulate hair growth is more difficult.

As for "Nanogain", nanogen, nanoworks, etc. We have used the NANO trademark in refence to hair-growth products for roughly 20 years or so. These guys are just trying to ride on our reputation. And maybe fool people into thinking their products contain NANO ( 3-carboxypyridine-N-Oxide ), our patented agent.

BTW, the latest knock-off, Purology's "NANOworks", not only infringes our trademarks, but also has a several of our patented agents in the ingredients list. I have complained to the parent company, L'Oreal.

We will see what happens. Lot of damn nerve, infringing both our trademarks and our patents. I suppose I ought to be honored that they have decided our products are worth knocking-off. Some of these big companies are completely unscrupulous.

Anyway, why use this stuff when the real thing is less expensive.

Peter H. Proctor, PhD,MD
 
Top