Then I take back what I said, but I don't see how I'm being insensitive. I know it's worse for a woman to lose hair. It's just that it's somewhere around 90+% more common in males, and it's not like it isn't easier for women to find solutions. How much more popular are wigs for men than wigs for women, especially when a hair piece can't cut it (ever saw a black man wear a hair piece?). It is also easier walking around with a wig as a woman than as a man. Two women at my workplace wear pieces, but guess what? It's as acceptible as some men there showing their baldness. Not to mention how men usually are dragged into spending hundreds of more dollars on transplants and drugs (that may fail them), instead of inexpensive, nifty little wigs. So no, it is not harder for women when it comes to hair loss.
Regardless of what % of females have hair loss, the hair is more than say...even a male hair transplant patient, almost always. Come to think of it I find it laughable that there's even a thing called female-pattern baldness. So, when was the last time someone personally saw a female, bald on top and dense on the sides/back, hmm? Probably never. I believe in female hair loss. I don't believe in women with shiny heads unless they have a cancer issue, in which case they would be unhealthy, but hardly ever is there a female Dr. Phil. :dunno:
Finally I think this fits in no particular category, so it probably belongs in off-topic. It should be in the male section as much as it should in the female.