hair transplant

jfrank

Established Member
Reaction score
1
i have a question for you guys... why are you so crazy about HM?? isnt the procedure the same as hair transplant, just without the scaring/stickes from the donor area? i do see the value of having unlimited supply of hair, but a lot of us on this forum are below norwood 4, therefore have plenty of donor hairs...
 

marsbtchsx

Established Member
Reaction score
6
unlimited hairs man!!!!!!!!!!! im not talking about coverage im talking about back to 13 yr old hair
 

Jay Tee

Established Member
Reaction score
0
That plus the fact that you can do it repeatedly if needed. Perhaps you have minor hairloss now and a good donor supply. Even if you get a hair transplant today, you may still need more work done down the line. With an unlimited supply, you can achieve this.
 

global

Experienced Member
Reaction score
7
jfrank said:
i have a question for you guys... why are you so crazy about HM?? isnt the procedure the same as hair transplant, just without the scaring/stickes from the donor area? i do see the value of having unlimited supply of hair, but a lot of us on this forum are below norwood 4, therefore have plenty of donor hairs...


You have plenty of donor hair NOW, but what about in the future when you've used all your donor hair to cover your NW4 and are now on your way to a NW6?

Also HM should allow much better density in the transplanted hairs.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Bring on the HM!!

Inject my f*****g temples and give me a 12 year olds hairline man!!

I don't give a f*** how much it costs......I'm doing it unless I get blessed with a finasteride miracle, which after 9 and a half months does not seem to be happening.
 
Top