tino
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 0
Its a funny world sometimes......
it s too bad about the money the spend.
most funny is that they tryed to induce hair growth in estrogen poor postmenopausal women
There is a difference between the hair growth relevant estrogen receptors of mice and humans.Independent of that,they should know that this experiment will fail.The study was made by Bioskin,a german cosmetic manufacturer.So i think that it was not their concern to proove a failure.I belive that they thought,that a antiestrogen could be marketed whitout problems,because it cant induce side effects.What a absurdity....if stronger estrogen promoting,or antiandrogen topicals will induce systemic side effects in the long term,deprivation of essential estrogen is also not healthy.
The end commentary is most funny...
The reasons for this lack of effect remain unclear.
Topical fulvestrant solution has no effect on male and postmenopausal female androgenetic alopecia: results from two randomized, proof-of-concept studies.Gassmueller J, Hoffmann R, Webster A.
Bioskin Institute for Dermatological Research and Development GmbH, Poppenbuetteler Bogen 25, 22399 Hamburg, Germany.
Background Androgenetic alopecia (pattern baldness) affects approximately half of all white-skinned men and women over the age of 40 years. Based on preclinical studies in mice in which topical fulvestrant (ICI182,780, an anti-oestrogen) caused telogen hair follicles to enter anagen, thereby causing hair growth, a topical formulation of fulvestrant was developed for the potential treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant solution in stimulating hair growth in men and postmenopausal women with androgenetic alopecia in two randomized, phase II, minoxidil- and/or vehicle-controlled studies. Methods One hundred and two white-skinned men aged 18-50 years with Norwood/Hamilton grades III, IIIv, IV, V or Va androgenetic alopecia received topical fulvestrant 70 mg mL(-1) solution, vehicle or minoxidil 2% solution twice daily for 16 weeks. Seventy postmenopausal women with Ludwig grade 1 or 2 androgenetic alopecia received topical fulvestrant 70 mg mL(-1) solution or vehicle twice daily for 16 weeks. The endpoints in both studies were hair density, cumulative hair thickness and hair growth rate, measured by TrichoScan analysis of digital images. Results There were no statistically significant differences favouring fulvestrant over vehicle at study end (day 113) for any of the efficacy parameters in men or women. Statistically significant differences in favour of minoxidil over fulvestrant were seen from day 57 onwards for hair density, cumulative hair thickness and hair growth rate in men. Conclusions These results indicate a lack of effect of topical fulvestrant in the treatment of subjects with androgenetic alopecia. The reasons for this lack of effect remain unclear.
PMID: 17986309 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
it s too bad about the money the spend.
most funny is that they tryed to induce hair growth in estrogen poor postmenopausal women
There is a difference between the hair growth relevant estrogen receptors of mice and humans.Independent of that,they should know that this experiment will fail.The study was made by Bioskin,a german cosmetic manufacturer.So i think that it was not their concern to proove a failure.I belive that they thought,that a antiestrogen could be marketed whitout problems,because it cant induce side effects.What a absurdity....if stronger estrogen promoting,or antiandrogen topicals will induce systemic side effects in the long term,deprivation of essential estrogen is also not healthy.The end commentary is most funny...
The reasons for this lack of effect remain unclear.
Topical fulvestrant solution has no effect on male and postmenopausal female androgenetic alopecia: results from two randomized, proof-of-concept studies.Gassmueller J, Hoffmann R, Webster A.
Bioskin Institute for Dermatological Research and Development GmbH, Poppenbuetteler Bogen 25, 22399 Hamburg, Germany.
Background Androgenetic alopecia (pattern baldness) affects approximately half of all white-skinned men and women over the age of 40 years. Based on preclinical studies in mice in which topical fulvestrant (ICI182,780, an anti-oestrogen) caused telogen hair follicles to enter anagen, thereby causing hair growth, a topical formulation of fulvestrant was developed for the potential treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant solution in stimulating hair growth in men and postmenopausal women with androgenetic alopecia in two randomized, phase II, minoxidil- and/or vehicle-controlled studies. Methods One hundred and two white-skinned men aged 18-50 years with Norwood/Hamilton grades III, IIIv, IV, V or Va androgenetic alopecia received topical fulvestrant 70 mg mL(-1) solution, vehicle or minoxidil 2% solution twice daily for 16 weeks. Seventy postmenopausal women with Ludwig grade 1 or 2 androgenetic alopecia received topical fulvestrant 70 mg mL(-1) solution or vehicle twice daily for 16 weeks. The endpoints in both studies were hair density, cumulative hair thickness and hair growth rate, measured by TrichoScan analysis of digital images. Results There were no statistically significant differences favouring fulvestrant over vehicle at study end (day 113) for any of the efficacy parameters in men or women. Statistically significant differences in favour of minoxidil over fulvestrant were seen from day 57 onwards for hair density, cumulative hair thickness and hair growth rate in men. Conclusions These results indicate a lack of effect of topical fulvestrant in the treatment of subjects with androgenetic alopecia. The reasons for this lack of effect remain unclear.
PMID: 17986309 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
