CAG repeats on androgen receptor gene and baldness....

michael barry

Senior Member
Reaction score
14
Variability in the Androgen Receptor Gene:

Strong Association With Androgenetic

Alopecia, Functional Implications and

Indication For Positive Selection

Hillmer, Axel M.;1 Becker, Tim;2 Myles, Sean;3 Freudenberg,

Jan;4 Brockschmidt, Felix F.;1 Stoneking, Mark;3 Kruse, Roland;5

Nöthen, Markus M.;1

1. Dept. of Genomics, Life and Brain Center, University of Bonn,

Bonn, Germany; 2. Inst. for Medical Biometry, Informatics

and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; 3.

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig,

Germany; 4. Dept. of Neurology, Laboratories of Neurogenetics,

UCSC, San Francisco, CA, USA; 5. Dept. of Dermatology,

University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

Androgenetic alopecia (Androgenetic Alopecia, male pattern baldness) is

the most common form of hair loss. Its pathogenesis is

androgen dependent, and genetic predisposition is the

major requirement for the phenotype. We have recently

demonstrated that genetic variability in the androgen

receptor gene (AR) is the cardinal prerequisite for the

development of early-onset Androgenetic Alopecia, with an etiological

fraction estimated at 0.46. The investigation of a large

number of genetic variants covering the AR locus suggests

that a polyglycine encoding GGN repeat in exon one is

a plausible candidate for conferring the functional effect.

The polyglycine tract is located in the transactivating domain

of the androgen receptor protein (AR), suggesting an effect

of repeat length on receptor function. We compared the

functional characteristics of the two most common alleles

(23 and 24 repeats) and two extreme alleles (10 and 27

repeats) in a reporter gene assay in HeLa cells. Our data

provide evidence of functional differences between the

two most common alleles of the AR GGN repeat. The

AR haplotype with the highest frequency (0.45) in the

German population, which confers risk to Androgenetic Alopecia, seems to

be evolutionarily recent, as indicated by the low sequence

identity with the ancestral haplotype and larger extent

of haplotype homozygosity. This implies that a variant

at the AR locus may have experienced recent positive

selection that led to an increase in frequency of the Androgenetic Alopecia

susceptibility allele in the European population




Kinda bad news huh?
 

harold

Established Member
Reaction score
11
michael barry said:
Kinda bad news huh?

I dunno. at least it indicates it was there for some evolutionary purpose. Even if just because a bunch of horny Vikings with too manny androgen receptors/DHT raped there way through Europe a 1000 years ago...
hh
 

michael barry

Senior Member
Reaction score
14
Even if just because a bunch of horny Vikings with too manny androgen receptors/DHT raped there way through Europe a 1000 years ago...
hh


damned, it is a punishment from god


In a way Harold, one can see how it might have been evolutionarily necessary to have extra androgenic stimuation 10,000 years ago in Europe. Cold................tons of bears, wolf-packs, aurochs (the large wild bulls that were aggressive and numerous) mammoths, maybe sabre tooths, lions (yes, lions were in Europe back then and Phillip of Macedonia who was ALexander the Greats father killed alot of them personally----could you imagine what a fierce predator a lion would be with forrested cover where they could really hide and amubush..........it would be even worse than out on the plains), the cold rains (pneumonia) the snows, warring tribes, the cold rivers........................................the men would have needed all the androgenic stimuation they could get for stamina to deal with that envirnoment and provide for others. It would have not been a tropical paradise. The side effect of baldness would be a very natural kind of occurence indeed. Indian men in India sure as hell seem to bald alot also.........................that enviorment would have been tough back then too.
 
Top