baby hair pics

[CCS]

I saw a pic of a biby, Diffuse NW5 pattern. His father is a NW4 right now. Do you think baby hair patterns tell us that those follicles are much weaker than the rest, and he will go bald some day?

http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nw5em6.jpg

 

[hair today gone tomorrow]

whats a biby? :dunno:

 

[michael barry]

[[url]http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.photohome.com/pictures/baby-pictures/baby-and-pumpkin-2a.jpg&imgrefurl=http://photohome.com/photos/baby-pictures/baby-and-pumpkin-2.html&h=400&w=600&sz=82&hair loss=en&start=48&um=1&tbnid=gEZLtHBI5xBdqM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=135&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbaby%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DGGLR,GGLR:2006-16,GGLR:en%26sa%3DN/img][/url]



[img]http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://farm1.static.flickr.com/252/514642582_8f24ba8032_o.jpg&imgrefurl=http://inphotos.org/adam-and-his-baby-soother/&h=467&w=700&sz=51&hair loss=en&start=167&um=1&tbnid=tvULZYIp9xDJqM:&tbnh=93&tbnw=140&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dbaby%26start%3D160%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DGGLR,GGLR:2006-16,GGLR:en%26sa%3DN

 

[hair today gone tomorrow]

michael are you ok?

 

[goingtomissmyhair]

I was just thinking about that the other day, actually... It sort of makes some sense... I'm a biology student and it seems as if this could have some truth to it. I will have to look at some baby pictures of around the same age of various family members that are bald/not bald and see if there is any correlation.

Interesting.

-goingtomissmyhair

 

[recognition2]

I'm sure you didn't want to start this thread CCS

 

[Guest]

Well I didn't really have much any hair before my 1st birthday, does that mean I'll go completely bald? :whistle:

 

[Jojje]

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh we are becoming baby`s :jump:

 

[sunnyone1]

I was wondering the same thing when I looked at my son's baby picture...at age 6 months, his temples were not grown in yet, so they had the appearance of being very receded. Of course, w/time they grew in. Can't help wondering though if there's a certain weakness in this area. I notice many babies whose temples are the last section to grow in. Is it perhaps a last in, first out mechanism? (for any accountants out there, I'm sure you recognize this as LIFO)

 

[RaginDemon]

first it was a 6 yrs old now a baby

what u gonna do next? turn into R Kelly?

 

[Jkkezh]

I've also been thinking about this, will try to get hold of some of my baby pics to see how my hair looked like back then then.

 

[michael barry]

Sunnyone wrote

I was wondering the same thing when I looked at my son's baby picture...at age 6 months, his temples were not grown in yet, so they had the appearance of being very receded. Of course, w/time they grew in. Can't help wondering though if there's a certain weakness in this area. I notice many babies whose temples are the last section to grow in. Is it perhaps a last in, first out mechanism?

That was exactly what I was trying to convey with the baby pictures (although the really "good" ones didn't load). We have all seen this: Some baby whose temples dont come in until very late, giving them that strong "V" pattern up there. You can almost bet that this is how they will receed when they are adults. Ever notice that when you see Mexican newborns, how their hairlines are practically intact as strong NW1's even when just a few months old? They hardly ever go bald if they really are all "Indian Blood" and have very little Spanish in them.


This shouldn't be a suprise. A hair's fate is supposedly decided way back in the early stages of fetal development in terms of its androgen response according to the researchers. Baldness is very genetically hard-wired to take place in the presence of testosterone.

 

[CCS]

I'm not talking about their big forheads. I'm talking about the very distint NW5 pattern.

 

[bubka]

I have actually thought the same thing, and i am sure there is some possible correlation with hair growth and hormones in both infants and male pattern baldness males

HOWEVER, you don't see babies with bald spots, (on the crown) its just the front which CAN SEEM similar...

i believe new born males have higher T levels then at any other time in life as well

 

[Guest]

i believe new born males have higher T levels then at any other time in life as well

Start of puberty.

 

[bubka]

i believe new born males have higher T levels then at any other time in life as well

Start of puberty.

what the f*** are you talking about?

again, the guy who thinks bullying can cause physical changes in the body proves his ignorance

 

[phish]

could make sense dunno hard to say though because 90 percent or more of babies ive seen have norwood 4-5s. if that were the case alot more would be bald. ive also seen baby pics of famous rock stars who were bald like those babys yet have full head of hair at 60. its clear though that temple hairs are very fragile and and take the longest to grow even in babies thats why treatments rarely if ever work to gain back terminal temple hair once lost for more then a year.