Ahh the good old defeatist attitude.
"If you're ugly you will always be ugly" - sorry, but that is a ridiculous attitude to have and exactly the sort of thing I was getting at in my post. Sure, some people are born with great facial features and will never go past NW1, but that is not reality for most people. With that being said though, you don't HAVE to be genetically gifted to be attractive. You can always become objectively more attractive through hard work. Why did you get your transplant if you did not think it would make you objectively more attractive? That is what I'm talking about, hard work and taking steps to change your appearance is how most people become attractive, not purely genetics. By arguing otherwise you're no worse than obese people who claim to be overweight because "muh guneticz made meh fat!!!1one"
Whining about how genetics ****ed you over and you can never compete with other men on a forum is the exact opposite of bettering yourself. Most people (probably close to 100% I'd say) have the
ability to make themselves more appealing, they just don't actually put in the work, and that's pretty much entirely your fault if that is the case.
Going to the gym won't change your results if you're ugly. Some guys can do whatever they want to "improve" themselves, their results won't change.
Dear god the delusion, Fred! Let's look at Vin Diesel. Now I know he's one of those guys everyone touts as an example for the "looks better bald" crowd, but do you seriously think people would think that if he didn't put in hours upon hours in the gym to have a good physique? What if he was a skinny loser or instead of being muscular he was pudgy and fat instead? He doesn't have great facial features objectively speaking. He's got kind of a fat face tbh, at least for someone his size. Again you are playing the defeatist card because you were not dealt a great hand. This is YOUR OWN FAULT. YOU are accepting defeat instead of saying "I will better myself". Saying "I shouldn't have to better myself for these judgmental women" is exactly the same as an overweight woman demanding skinny men be attracted to her because "I shouldn't have to lose weight to have a fit boyfriend". No, Fred. That is not how the world works.
Most women also spend hours upon hours taking care of themselves, starve themselves so they are thin, etc. but then some guy expects her to be into him even though he probably puts in the bare minimum to make sure he doesn't stink (IF that!), probably has a subpar sense of style, and has a ****ty/obviously insecure attitude to top it off. Yeah, it definitely all comes down to the hairline, Fred! Darn women and their selectiveness.. if it weren't for these genetics!
It's true, you shouldn't expect someone to sleep with you if they're not attracted to you. But you know what? If a girl doesn't find you attractive, she never will, no matter what you do.
That's just so wrong. I can't even begin to imagine what world you live in where you think this is true. I was a scrawny little emo kid in High School. A few years later I got pretty cut and all of a sudden the very same women who rejected me in High School wanted my dick. I guess if you improve your appearance but your mindset is still that of an insecure unattractive guy then yeah no **** they won't all of a sudden become attracted to you. For the record, I was known as having awesome hair in High School and by the time I made these changes and those women started coming onto me I was already a NW4. I saw myself declining, so I took steps to change myself in ways I could control. It's not a hard concept.
I think attraction is static, and genetic.
Yeah, TOTALLY. Because hard work means nothing. An attractive person can put on 200 lbs and still be attractive, because genetics. Absolutely ridiculous. Hair is a FACTOR but it is only a factor not the entire story. Being NW1 guarantees you nothing. I bet you brush off the changes in these people's appearance simply because "duh they have a full head of hair of course they're attractive" even though their attractiveness has obviously changed while their hair has remained static.
It's on us you say? At least we would give a lot of women a chance.
That's exactly what I'm saying. You're acting as if nothing you do matters when that couldn't be further from the truth. And a lot of guys like you who are probably like 3-5s on the 10-scale claim that they aren't so judgmental but then expect women of a much higher caliber to be interested in them. It's ridiculous, you can't expect women who are 6-8s to be interested in you if you're like a 4 at best. I'm sorry if you're a short NW6, that must suck balls. I can't even imagine. But if you're an unattractive man then you have to set your sights on unattractive women. This is the real world where you get back what you put into it. That doesn't mean women have too high of standards, if anything the ironic part is that you're probably the one with standards set much too high, especially since you seem to think nothing you do has the power to improve your appearance. This line of thought is often used by the same sort of guys who self identify as "nice guys"... who are pretty much universally not nice guys.
Honestly it sounds like you're trolling at this point.
