Yes because companies are going to research and shell out money for prevention (ie the ongoing cure forever), rather then growing hair for 20~ year old NW5/6/7s that make up a very small percentage of the hairloss sufferers. I never said it couldn't be done, it just won't be where the focus is to start off when we have such low hanging fruit like AR gene expression that can be knocked down with mRNA. Growth will probably have to be achieved by a more old-school drug/small molecule first then maintained with mRNA knockdown or eventually editing.In your previous post you said gene editing will be preventative for hair loss and you will still need cloning.
It can't make you taller, it can't get you hair back, so what can it do?
You could use gene editing on adults to correct basically anything imaginable that doesn't require a developmental state to achieve, like IQ, height, etc. Even those applications could eventually be sorted if they were able to find out how to reset cells to a developmental state, which is also being worked on quite heavily.