Ot: Study: Women: "80% Of Men Ugly/ 10% Avg/ 10% Attractive

[HankPentagon]

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4pghyc/ok_men_heres_the_data_80_of_you_are_ugly_10/

OK Men Here's the Data. 80% of you are ugly, 10% average and 10% attractive

Guys..........This is what you are up against because

1. Women can get pregnant without a husband now

2. They get inordinate attention on social media, and because the men want sex, they think the men also would hypothetically ring them

3. Hypergamy in a feminized industrial world in which a women works in a service economy and doesnt need a strong man to protect her

4. Cel Phones are the portal to the deslusional female world in which they have seen/fucked SOOO many men that their standards are ridiciulous

5. This data obviously indicates that we need a revolution in which women having sex outside of marriage is a stoning offense.

 

[shookwun]

Bla bla


Accept your a minority andalmost every man you see is actively dating or in a relationship.



So much cope to sip.

 

[hollow11]

welcome to the future

 

[SmoothSailing]

It was determined that the bottom 80% of men are competing for the bottom 22% of women

Quite depressing, but most couples are around looksmatched. I think casual sex is for girls, top guys and guys willing to f*** the bottom 20% (who aren't in the bottom 20% themselves).

1. For all of human history this was true.

2.The opposite occurs in men, many have no luck on social media and thus believe no woman would want them. unfortunately this almost guarantees that no woman will want them.

3. Possibly the biggest factor is that no one needs a mate for protection, food or money. This makes attraction a much more valued attribute than it was historically.

4. True but it's also hugely affected by large populations allowing people to f*** around indefinitely, men will f*** down, women won't. Thus more options affects men worse.

5. Really what you should want is guys not to f*** down. If we all just said no to any girl not looksmatched it would be fixed. This will never happen, evolution prevails (genes of guys who f*** around will survive)

 

[hairblues]

Quite depressing, but most couples are around looksmatched. I think casual sex is for girls, top guys and guys willing to f*** the bottom 20% (who aren't in the bottom 20% themselves).

1. For all of human history this was true.

2.The opposite occurs in men, many have no luck on social media and thus believe no woman would want them. unfortunately this almost guarantees that no woman will want them.

3. Possibly the biggest factor is that no one needs a mate for protection, food or money. This makes attraction a much more valued attribute than it was historically.

4. True but it's also hugely affected by large populations allowing people to f*** around indefinitely, men will f*** down, women won't. Thus more options affects men worse.

5. Really what you should want is guys not to f*** down. If we all just said no to any girl not looksmatched it would be fixed. This will never happen, evolution prevails (genes of guys who f*** around will survive)

Attraction, looks, and male strength was always an attraction for women

its only 10,000 years that women were valued for their 'virtue' and were shamed if not married by 18 or had to solely rely on a man to provide for them. before that women were 'gatherers' who provided food as well, women had more than one lover in there life time, and they chose men based on physical attraction, virility and strength.
NOT social pressure to be 'married' and 'kept'.

so if anything we are actually returning in many ways to our natural animal instincts.
we are doing what is coming natural.

 

[SmoothSailing]

Attraction, looks, and male strength was always an attraction for women

its only 10,000 years that women were valued for their 'virtue' and were shamed if not married by 18 or had to solely rely on a man to provide for them. before that women were 'gatherers' who provided food as well, women had more than one lover in there life time, and they chose men based on physical attraction, virility and strength.
NOT social pressure to be 'married' and 'kept'.

so if anything we are actually returning in many ways to our natural animal instincts.
we are doing what is coming natural.

Historically women yearned to "keep" a man in order for protection etc. for them and their babies. They still do but much less so.

 

[hairblues]

Historically women yearned to "keep" a man in order for protection etc. for them and their babies. They still do but much less so.

I agree I think that is the physical draw....this was not the case for 10000 years, its been the 'expectation' of society as main driving force of who we settle for.

so OP would like to force 'settling' again when we just moved out of this relatively speaking in the course of history.

BUT most men want to be 'chosen' they don't want to be settled for..thats the paradox.

they want the illusion of being chosen..not the actual reality of choice..('they' meaning men like OP, not you)

 

[HankPentagon]

Bla bla


Accept your a minority andalmost every man you see is actively dating or in a relationship.



So much cope to sip.

Bullshit.

Half of men over 18 live alone

Half of marriages divorce

There are appx 50 million american men out of a relationship

About ten million of that have decent dating prospects

 

[Trichosan]

...

4... men will f*** down, women won't...

Strange, how I never thought about that before, but so true. That is sexist! I demand social justice!

 

[shookwun]

Lol at random numbers.


18 is a kid.
Who says you need to live with a women to be considered dating and in a relationship

You will see that after 21 almost everyone around you is in some form of relationship or actively dating.



Face it, It's always the same ugly retards with weak skulls who are alone and are a minority among everyone else. Most of them also happen to be social retards which is no surprise.


Seem to think a few incels posting on red edit and HairLossTalk.com account for everyone else.

 

[IggyPop]

Seriously, OP, most people are average-looking/slightly above average, a minority is good-looking and a yet smaller minority is ugly as f***. We belong to the latter, and we can only get over it. Genetics condemned us, that's it. Accept it and move on.

To most women you are "ugly", when you are in the bottom 30-40%. You can still find a relationship then, but it will be very hard to find love.

 

[CopeForLife]

Agree on cell phones being a portal for girls to good looking guys.

THis invention changed dating scene a lot

Now girls are just two messages away from being fucked in the cafe toilet cabin by a good looking guy from Tinder they matched a few minutes ago

 

[4myfuture]

This is one of the dumbest threads ever! I sit here and read this and think of countless scenarios where the woman is dating someone way less attractive..I see ugly men with good looking women all the time..Im pretty positive it's quite the opposite in that men dont date below them. I will agree that men are more likely to screw below their looks level, however that is something different entirely...In terms of one night stands, it's likely way easier for women to convert. But thats more because men are more desporate in this department and will go with just about anything..Otherwise, I feel your more likely to see hot women with ugly men than vide versa...

 

[JeanLucBB]

Quite depressing, but most couples are around looksmatched. I think casual sex is for girls, top guys and guys willing to f*** the bottom 20% (who aren't in the bottom 20% themselves).

1. For all of human history this was true.

2.The opposite occurs in men, many have no luck on social media and thus believe no woman would want them. unfortunately this almost guarantees that no woman will want them.

3. Possibly the biggest factor is that no one needs a mate for protection, food or money. This makes attraction a much more valued attribute than it was historically.

4. True but it's also hugely affected by large populations allowing people to f*** around indefinitely, men will f*** down, women won't. Thus more options affects men worse.

5. Really what you should want is guys not to f*** down. If we all just said no to any girl not looksmatched it would be fixed. This will never happen, evolution prevails (genes of guys who f*** around will survive)

Women may not f*** down, but they aren't solely considering your looks. Even for a woman who is an 8, there is a binary threshold of what that they will potentially f*** regarding looks and that line is probably around 5/10 for most. Brains, money, personality, education, presentation and dress sense go a long way to balance the gap and most of those can be improved.

I have personal experience hitting above my weight with casual roots, both drunk club sl*ts at 2 am on weekends and various hookup apps that don't require an initial match to chat. My male friends range from average looking to extremely attractive and all of them are regularly getting casual sex often with girls more attractive than they are. In my case and for most of my friends we could probably f*** 3 new women every week but the main issue is we and most guys our age live with our parents. The issue is that there are too many suitable pussies to f*** whenever one feels like it, not a lack of.

 

[HankPentagon]

I agree I think that is the physical draw....this was not the case for 10000 years, its been the 'expectation' of society as main driving force of who we settle for.

so OP would like to force 'settling' again when we just moved out of this relatively speaking in the course of history.

BUT most men want to be 'chosen' they don't want to be settled for..thats the paradox.

they want the illusion of being chosen..not the actual reality of choice..('they' meaning men like OP, not you)

The entire female use of makeup is an illusion

They are the same pct as men only ten pct attractive

 

[hollow11]

Seriously, OP, most people are average-looking/slightly above average, a minority is good-looking and a yet smaller minority is ugly as f***. We belong to the latter, and we can only get over it. Genetics condemned us, that's it. Accept it and move on.

Girls now swipe good-looking guys pictures' as if they were nothing, you gotta be at least 7/10 to have a slight chance.

yeah, it's called average because its the majority
its true though that you can't find love on tinder for example, 99% of the people on that are there for one and just one thing

 

[hollow11]

The entire female use of makeup is an illusion

They are the same pct as men only ten pct attractive

less imo, I know many girls, and like , less than 10% are attractive without makeup. Maybe it's just that when you see so many fake women, it changes your views on beauty. Because of this, without a makeup you can be a goddess and still look average.

 

[shookwun]

yeah, it's called average because its the majority
its true though that you can't find love on tinder for example, 99% of the people on that are there for one and just one thing

These people don't understand the law of averageness.


It has nothing to do with being a 5/10.


Best way to put is symmetry, and not having facial irregularities. Which puts you in a category of averageness.


Masculinity (dimorphism) is the most important mark for attraction. Even more important then symmetry and averageness.

 

[hollow11]

These people don't understand the law of averageness.


It has nothing to do with being a 5/10.


Best way to put is symmetry, and not having facial irregularities. Which puts you in a category of averageness.


Masculinity (dimorphism) is the most important mark for attraction. Even more important then symmetry and averageness.

thats what i meant

 

[JeanLucBB]

less imo, I know many girls, and like , less than 10% are attractive without makeup. Maybe it's just that when you see so many fake women, it changes your views on beauty. Because of this, without a makeup you can be a goddess and still look average.

If you think that less than 10% of girls are attractive and that makeup makes most woman more attractive to begin with, you are a raging homosexual. Not a surprise you're clueless about your own sexuality considering your overall cluelessness in general.