Nitric oxide in the human hair follicle: constitutive and dihydrotestosterone-induced

squeegee

Banned
Reaction score
132
[h=1]Nitric oxide in the human hair follicle: constitutive and dihydrotestosterone-induced nitric oxide synthase expression and NO production in dermal papilla cells.[/h]Wolf R, Schönfelder G, Paul M, Blume-Peytavi U.
[h=3]Source[/h]Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Benjamin Franklin, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

[h=3]Abstract[/h]The free radical nitric oxide, generated by different types of epidermal and dermal cells, has been identified as an important mediator in various physiological and pathophysiological processes of the skin, such as regulation of blood flow, melanogenesis, wound healing, and hyperproliferative skin diseases. However, little is known about the role of NO in the human hair follicle and in hair cycling processes. Here we demonstrate for the first time that dermal papilla cells derived from human hair follicles spontaneously produce NO by measuring nitrate and nitrite levels in culture supernatants. This biomolecule is apparently formed by the endothelial isoform of nitric oxide synthase, which was detected at the mRNA and protein levels. Remarkably, basal NO level was enhanced threefold by stimulating dermal papilla cells with 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) but not with testosterone. Addition of N-[3-(aminomethyl)benzyl]acetamidine (1400W), a highly selective inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase, restrained the elevation in NO level induced by DHT. Analyses of DHT-stimulated cells at the mRNA and protein levels confirmed the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase. These findings suggest NO as a signaling molecule in human dermal papilla cells and implicate basal and androgen-mediated NO production to be involved in the regulation of hair follicle activity.
 

benjt

Experienced Member
Reaction score
100
I find this extremely suprising.

The authors of the paper state that DHT increases NO levels drastically. For people suffering from Androgenetic Alopecia/male pattern baldness, it has been reported that DHT is usually quite high. Thus, it would seem that in people with Androgenetic Alopecia/male pattern baldness, NO levels are higher than otherwise. On the other hand, Minoxidil consists of NO, and still induces hair growth.

Anyone who can explain this?

Wikipedia states that Minoxidil might be an NO-agonist, though this is only a theory in literature and not confirmed. Again, however, if DHT raises NO levels, then NO levels in people with Androgenetic Alopecia/male pattern baldness should be higher. Then the question is: Why is Minoxidil working?
 

IDW2BB

Established Member
Reaction score
19
http://www.nature.com/jid/journal/v129/n4/full/jid2008296a.html
We have demonstrated that in human epidermis and in sweat on the skin surface nitrate is the predominant NO-related product, followed by nitrite, with only very low concentrations of RSNOs being present. Both nitrate and nitrite are available from exogenous and endogenous sources. Green leafy vegetables make up 60–80% of the daily nitrate intake of those on a typical Western diet (<!--bib66-->Ysart et al., 1999) whereas nitrite is used as a preservative for meat and fish (<!--bib29-->Lundberg et al., 2004). The main endogenous source of nitrate and nitrite is the L-arginine–NO pathway, which is constitutively active in all cell types in the body. L-arginine is converted to NO by inducible nitric oxide synthase, an enzyme which is upregulated in human skin 8–10 hours after UV exposure (<!--bib24-->Kuhn et al., 1998). Nitrite can also be generated from commensal bacteria in the digestive system by nitrate reduction. An enterosalivary recirculation pathway exists, with 25% of all circulating nitrate being taken up by the salivary glands and secreted in saliva. The oral cavity contains large numbers of nitrate-reducing bacteria, with the result that saliva is the main source of plasma nitrite (<!--bib4-->Benjamin et al., 1994). <!--bib28-->Lundberg and Govoni (2004) have demonstrated that dietary nitrate ingestion influences both plasma nitrate and nitrite but not RSNO levels. Analysis of our data suggests that the concentration of NO-related products in an individual's plasma will influence the concentration of NO-related products found in their sweat and superficial vascular dermis. Thus, dietary nitrate may offer a source for manipulation of cutaneous NO-related products.
Historically, evidence for the existence of stored forms of NO dates back to experiments performed in the 1950s on the relaxant effect of light on vascular smooth muscle (<!--bib15-->Furchgott et al., 1961). Photorelaxation in rabbit aorta was shown by Furchgott et al. to peak near 310 nm with a shoulder near 350 nm. The role of nitrite in photorelaxation was implicated when a dominant peak was shown at 355 nm following incubation with nitrite (<!--bib14-->Furchgott, 1971). More recently, <!--bib43-->Rodriguez et al. (2003) have shown that in rat vascular tissue RSNOs, RNNOs, and nitrite have photoactivity in vitro but nitrate shows no appreciable activity. They calculated the action spectra for NO release from RSNOs to be 310–340 nm and from nitrite 310 and 350 nm.
It has been hypothesized that NO-related products stored in human skin may be involved in the acute response to UV (<!--bib38-->Paunel et al., 2005). Paunel et al. demonstrated formation of NO due to photodecomposition of nitrite and RSNOs maximal within 20 minutes of UVA exposure of ex vivo full-thickness human skin (<!--bib38-->Paunel et al., 2005). We have now demonstrated this effect in human skin in vivo with cutaneous microdialysis. Dialysate sampling of the superficial vascular dermis revealed an increase in NO-related products maximal 30 minutes after exposure to a biologically relevant dose of UVA1 (30 J cm[SUP]−2[/SUP]). Gaseous NO released within the dermis will undergo oxidative decomposition on entering the extracellular vascular space forming aqueous nitrite. Although both RSNOs and nitrite will release NO in the UVA spectrum, the relative concentrations of nitrite and RSNOs that we demonstrated in human skin suggest that nitrite is likely to be the predominant photoactive NO-related product. NO may play an anti-apoptotic role in human skin following UVR (<!--bib51-->Suschek et al., 1999, <!--bib52-->2003; <!--bib59-->Weller et al., 2003) and it is likely that cutaneous NO-related products offer an immediate enzyme-independent source of NO, allowing protection within 30 minutes of exposure to UVR. As proposed by <!--bib38-->Paunel et al. (2005), this enzyme-independent NO release bridges the time gap following UV exposure before the upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase and enzyme-dependent NO release is maximal.
Interindividual variation in the concentration of NO-related products in human saliva, plasma, sweat, epidermis, and superficial vascular dermis was seen in our subjects and was similar in each of the different biological samples. Gladwin (<!--bib16-->Gladwin et al., 2005) has suggested that the majority of nitrite in tissues originates from the exogenous intake of nitrite and nitrate and not from endogenous sources, thus resulting in great variation in tissue nitrite levels with nitrate and nitrite intake. In contrast plasma levels of nitrite vary only slightly suggesting the existence of regulatory pathways in blood (<!--bib8-->Bryan et al., 2005).
Enzyme-dependent NO production occurs in all cell types of human skin by at least one of the three NO synthase isoenzymes. NO is produced constantly by the endothelium at 4 nM per second (<!--bib32-->Marley et al., 2001). We have confirmed the presence of NO-related products in the dermis and epidermis but have not isolated the storage site to a particular cell type. On exposure to UVA a significant increase in aqueous NO-related products is detected by cutaneous microdialysis, and this increase is reduced in the presence of a local vasoconstrictor. Both nitrite and RSNOs are transported in the bloodstream and are susceptible to photolysis by UVA. We suspect that much of the observed increase in NO-related products following UVA exposure comes directly from the vasculature, but with locally bound stores also contributing. Hypertension and ischemic heart disease both correlate with latitude (<!--bib13-->Fleck, 1989; <!--bib46-->Rostand, 1997), increasing in incidence with distance from the equator. Much of this is probably due to racial and dietary factors, and a correlation has been also recently shown between UV-induced vitamin D synthesis and reduced ischemic heart disease (<!--bib56-->Wang et al., 2008). Our data, showing UV release of skin-bound NO-related products, suggest this as an alternative mechanism by which UV exposure may have beneficial cardiovascular effects.
We present data that confirm and quantify the presence of NO-related products both in human epidermis, superficial vascular dermis and skin surface sweat. These species have the capability of releasing NO, and we have demonstrated such release within 30 minutes of UVA exposure. We believe these findings to be of great significance, in the context of the skin as the largest “organ” of the human body (10–20 dm[SUP]3[/SUP]), which thus offers a considerable store. We believe that enzyme-independent NO release is an acute mechanism preventing UV-induced keratinocyte apoptosis (<!--bib38-->Paunel et al., 2005). It is known that NO-related products in plasma can be influenced by dietary intake of nitrate and we have demonstrated a relationship between the concentration of NO-related products in plasma and that of the superficial vascular dermis and sweat. We postulate that an individual's dietary consumption of green leafy vegetables may in part influence their cutaneous response to UVR.

- - - Updated - - -
 

Sparky4444

Senior Member
Reaction score
44
so if you're juicing up the NO with your diet, wear a ball cap and work-out, get a sweat going...right?? ;-)
 

benjt

Experienced Member
Reaction score
100
But why would you want to juice em up?

The first study posted by squeegee shows that DHT causes NO synthase. It would be logical to assume that people with high DHT levels or high DHT sensitivity would thus have high NO levels anyway.

On the other hand, minoxidil and adenosine are both NO compounds, and they induce hair growth, even though - if I understand that study correctly - NO levels should be high in Androgenetic Alopecia/male pattern baldness patients anyway.

I don't get it.
 

Sparky4444

Senior Member
Reaction score
44
But why would you want to juice em up?

The first study posted by squeegee shows that DHT causes NO synthase. It would be logical to assume that people with high DHT levels or high DHT sensitivity would thus have high NO levels anyway.

On the other hand, minoxidil and adenosine are both NO compounds, and they induce hair growth, even though - if I understand that study correctly - NO levels should be high in Androgenetic Alopecia/male pattern baldness patients anyway.

I don't get it.

High DHT levels doesn't mean you're NO levels are high...get that straight right away...
 

benjt

Experienced Member
Reaction score
100
But this sounds like it does:
Remarkably, basal NO level was enhanced threefold by stimulating dermal papilla cells with 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) but not with testosterone. Addition of N-[3-(aminomethyl)benzyl]acetamidine (1400W), a highly selective inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase, restrained the elevation in NO level induced by DHT.
 

Sparky4444

Senior Member
Reaction score
44
But this sounds like it does:

No..it doesn't necessarily...My NO levels were in the tank and my diffuse thinning was just kicking in hard core...you can't draw a direct relationship with this...NO is involved in everything!
 

benjt

Experienced Member
Reaction score
100
But the paper itself speaks of an "elevation in NO level induced by DHT", and that "basal NO level was enhanced threefold by stimulating dermal papilla cells with DHT". Also, bear in mind that vegetables with exceedingly high NO values lead to hair loss and other disease patterns mostly concerning the skin.

Maybe the NO compounds in minoxidil are in fact agonists of body-type NO compounds, docking to NO receptors, but with weaker effect than body NO? On the other hand, minoxidil raises adenosine levels, and adenosine is a body NO...

It still does not make any sense. Maybe in fact everything is okay with NO levels in people suffering from Androgenetic Alopecia/male pattern baldness, and NO levels are not the key here.

The one effect of NO that is 100% is that it relaxes tissue and widens vessels, cells, etc, leading to a flush.
 

IDW2BB

Established Member
Reaction score
19
http://sexualmed.org/sexmed/index.cfm/risk-factors/for-men/propecia-proscar-and-avodart/
The pathophysiology of 5 alpha reductase inhibitors on sexual function may be related to reduction of dihydrotestosterone levels. Nitric oxide and the enzyme, nitric oxide synthase are critically important in sexually stimulated penile erections. Dihydrotestosterone is more potent than testosterone in raising nitric oxide synthase activity. Because 5 alpha reductase inhibitors reduce serum levels of dihydrotestosterone, this effect may be responsible for erectile dysfunction by reducing levels of nitric oxide and reducing nitric oxide synthase activity in the penile erection tissues
Researchers have documented that at high doses, finasteride impaired erectile function by altering nitric oxide activity in the penis. In addition, investigators examined the effect of testosterone on penile erection. In this study, animals were divided into five groups: sham-operated controls, castrated controls, castrates treated with testosterone, castrates treated with dihydrotestosterone, and castrates treated with a combination of testosterone and a 5 alpha reductase inhibitor. 5 alpha reductase inhibitors caused both a decrease in nitric oxide activity in the erection tissue and a reduction in erectile response to electrical stimulation.
Could altering epidermal NO levels influence dermal signaling? A crosstalk of sorts? Who the hell knows!:lost:
 

benjt

Experienced Member
Reaction score
100
Maybe NO levels in people with DHT are in fact normal, but they are not high enough to battle the local fibrosis? Fibrotic tissue needs higher NO levels to still be supplied with blood and nutrients. This is probably how minoxidil works, as it raises NO levels.
 
Top