end of baldness.they figured it out all.
- Thread starter 2young2retire
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 2,634
100% gene expression is not necessary.
[uncomfortable man mode]
Indeed. We should get excited when they bring out some results...not on mice but on humans and then a product out in 3-6 months which works 100% on reh regrowth area...
Lots of crap about results on mice (even in the news) but nothing out yet. They are bringing hope and then killing it slowly by giving us nothing. As showing a foodmenu to an african kid from a poor country and telling him to hang on while there's no food at all. Someone said 2015 is the year? Why 2015? Why not 2014? or why wasn't it 2013, 2012, 2011, etcetc it's not like baldness haven't been a problem since the beginning. We got research from 1980s about this...what makes the future so special?
[/uncomfortable man mode]
Just tired of all the crap I'm hearing n getting no results. Also the hairloss conference is on youtube. Some korean dude made a new hairloss classification: BASP. I like it since it's much better than NH to show baldness...
Looking back at this thread title might it have been a bit preliminary? I mean we are talking about a problem that has been unsolved for what a few hundred years so while that could change I think realistically there is still some ways to go. Nothing is every certain until its being done and shown it works every last piece of it especially in medicine.
bushbush
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 85
*hundreds of thousands of years
uncomfortable man
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 490
You must be new here. *looks at post count* yup.
Lol that long huh
I.D WALKER
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 869
Yeah it seems that hare petered out. The enthusiasm was there which is cool and in a whirlwind here and gone.
DP cells that more closely resemble human hair is one step out of many more. Realistically I still think its decades away personally. The other stuff is more exciting like SM, bim because those are growth stimulants that are a few years away instead. The future is promising but all this stem cell stuff is way too advanced to be in real world use anytime soon.
slam1523
Banned
- Reaction score
- 17
Why comments like this are made is beyond me... Not one person here has the slightest idea where science is in these studies, or how likely it is something tied to stem cells could actually be marketable in a couple of years... Not a single fact backs your opinion, yet your claims are regarding advancements you know little to nothing about!
I.D WALKER
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 869
I should have clarified that I was responding strictly to the fact that the thread topic itself faded. It was not a criticism directed at the scientific process and it's fastidious protocol to which time constraints can hardly be applicable.
If anyone here would be gracious enough to offer their insight into the more recent scientific development of this fascinating topic their contributions are allways welcomed.
davewalsh112233
Member
- Reaction score
- 2
Post title is misleading
I clicked on this post because I thought I was going to "find the cure!" Nope, far from it.
I clicked on this post because I thought I was going to "find the cure!" Nope, far from it.
Cut me some slack I only came in here looking for the cure. I didnt see it.