College,
The Apple Poly website is designed in a traditional Internet marketing fashion as I have stated before in various posts.
I know how these sites work from top to bottom and I should considering this is in part my industry field and profession.
These sites are designed to make people buy and buy the do!
For most unseasoned Internet users and even
some well seasoned veterans it is hard to escape the stranglehold of Internet marketing and sales copy techniques.
Most of you here on this forum are skeptical to begin with as a result of previous experiences which may include failed treatments or run-ins with other snake oil merchants, so you are already alert to the fact, what ever that fact may be.
Despite what I know about sites like Apple Poly, I still went ahead and ordered six months worth of the topical and internal booster capsules.
Why? I am eager to put this product to the test as I have said if it can work for me it will work for anyone I am very certain of that.
Another worthy point to realize is that the price of Apple Poly is likely inflated allowing for profits to be paid to referring affiliates as is almost always the case with such Internet marketed product lines.
This then begs the question however of whether or not Apple Poly's product is as cost effective as other brands, well as I originally wrote in
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/discussions ... c&start=11 my compariso between Swansons Procyanidin B2 vs Apple Poly's Procyanidin B2 still left Apple Poly in front despite the allowed "buffer" for affiliate dollars.
Efficiency, purity, potency, etc, these are all key factors that must be measured against each of these Procyanidin B2 products offered. David from Apple Poly assures his products quality and I have quizzed him lightly via e-mail (all context taken with a grain of salt of course).
On a final note I believe what we need to be looking at is the mechanism by which Procyanidin B2 functions and this is by inhibiting TGF-Beta from what I have read.
Did you read that new post by Michael Barry?
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/discussions ... hp?t=33524
It is highly relevant considering this topic and TGF-Beta and you will also notice that Docj077 chimes in with a post confirming the relationship between the study and TGF-Beta, who has been a strong advocate of inhibiting the TGF-Beta pathway from much of what I've read.
It would appear that some complexities of hair loss are slowly becoming clearer to us.